Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The problem asks us to first identify the smallest 3-digit number 'N' that meets a specific set of criteria for its digits. Once we find this number, we need to calculate how many factors (divisors) it has.
Step 2: Key Formula or Approach:
To find the number of factors of an integer N, we first find its prime factorization, say \(N = p_1^{a_1} \times p_2^{a_2} \times \cdots \times p_k^{a_k}\). The total number of factors is then given by the product of one more than each exponent:
\[ \text{Number of Factors} = (a_1 + 1)(a_2 + 1)\cdots(a_k + 1) \]
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
We need to find the smallest number N by carefully applying all the given conditions.
Condition 1: Digits are non-zero.
The possible digits are \(\{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9\}\).
Condition 2: No digit is a perfect square.
The single-digit perfect squares are 1, 4, and 9. We must exclude these.
The remaining allowed digits are\( \{2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8\}\).
Condition 3: Only 1 of the three digits is a prime number.
From the allowed set \(\{2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8\}\), let's identify the primes and non-primes.
- Prime digits: \(\{2, 3, 5, 7\}\).
- Non-prime (composite) digits: \(\{6, 8\}.\)
The condition means our 3-digit number must be formed using exactly one digit from \(\{2, 3, 5, 7\}\) and two digits from \(\{6, 8\}. \)
Finding the smallest possible number N:
To construct the smallest possible 3-digit number, we must:
1. Choose the smallest possible digits that fit the criteria.
2. Arrange these digits in ascending order.
To get the smallest digits, we should choose the smallest prime (which is 2) and the two non-primes (which are 6 and 8).
The set of digits we must use is \(\{2, 6, 8\}. \)
To form the smallest number with these digits, we place the smallest digit in the hundreds place, the next smallest in the tens place, and the largest in the units place.
Smallest number N = 268.
Finding the number of factors of N = 268:
First, we find the prime factorization of 268.
\[ 268 = 2 \times 134 \] \[ 268 = 2 \times 2 \times 67 \] \[ 268 = 2^2 \times 67^1 \] Here, the exponents are \(a_1 = 2\) and \(a_2 = 1\).
Using the formula for the number of factors:
\[ \text{Number of Factors} = (2 + 1)(1 + 1) = 3 \times 2 = 6 \]
Step 4: Final Answer:
The number of factors of the smallest such number (268) is 6.
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is:
The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where it best fits among the options 1, 2, 3, or 4 indicated in the paragraph.
Sentence: While taste is related to judgment, with thinkers at the time often writing, for example, about “judgments of taste” or using the two terms interchangeably, taste retains a vital link to pleasure, embodiment, and personal specificity that is too often elided in post-Kantian ideas about judgment—a link that Arendt herself was working to restore.
Paragraph: \(\underline{(1)}\) Denneny focused on taste rather than judgment in order to highlight what he believed was a crucial but neglected historical change. \(\underline{(2)}\) Over the course of the seventeenth century and early eighteenth century, across Western Europe, the word taste took on a new extension of meaning, no longer referring specifically to gustatory sensation and the delights of the palate but becoming, for a time, one of the central categories for aesthetic—and ethical—thinking. \(\underline{(3)}\) Tracing the history of taste in Spanish, French, and British aesthetic theory, as Denneny did, also provides a means to recover the compelling and relevant writing of a set of thinkers who have been largely neglected by professional philosophy. \(\underline{(4)}\)