Step 1: Split the money
Mohan divides ₹M in the ratio \(1:2\). So, the smaller part = \(\dfrac{M}{3}\) and the larger part = \(\dfrac{2M}{3}\).
Step 2: Assign interest rates
Suppose the smaller part is deposited at rate \(r\). Then the larger part is deposited at rate \(\dfrac{r}{2}\). It is given that one of the rates is \(10\%\). So possibilities are:
Step 3: Write compound interest formula
For amount \(P\) at rate \(R\%\) compounded yearly for \(2\) years: \[ \text{CI} = P \left(1 + \frac{R}{100}\right)^2 - P \]
Step 4: Check Case 1
Smaller deposit = \(\dfrac{M}{3}\) at \(10\%\). \[ \text{CI}_1 = \frac{M}{3}\left[(1.1)^2 - 1\right] = \frac{M}{3}(0.21) = 0.07M \] Larger deposit = \(\dfrac{2M}{3}\) at \(5\%\). \[ \text{CI}_2 = \frac{2M}{3}\left[(1.05)^2 - 1\right] = \frac{2M}{3}(0.1025) \approx 0.06833M \] Total interest = \(0.07M + 0.06833M = 0.13833M\).
Given total interest = 830. \[ 0.13833M = 830 \quad \Rightarrow \quad M \approx 6000 \]
Step 5: Verify deposits
Smaller deposit = \(\dfrac{6000}{3} = 2000 > 1000\). Larger deposit = \(\dfrac{2 \times 6000}{3} = 4000 > 1000\). ✅ Hence valid.
Step 6: Case 2 check (for completeness)
If smaller deposit = \(\dfrac{M}{3}\) at \(20\%\) and larger = \(\dfrac{2M}{3}\) at \(10\%\), then total interest turns out much larger than 830, so this case is invalid.
\[ \boxed{M = 6000} \]
Health insurance plays a vital role in ensuring financial protection and access to quality healthcare. In India, however, the extent and nature of health insurance coverage vary significantly between urban and rural areas. While urban populations often have better access to organized insurance schemes, employer-provided coverage, and awareness about health policies, rural populations face challenges such as limited outreach of insurance schemes, inadequate infrastructure, and lower awareness levels. This urban-rural divide in health insurance coverage highlights the broader issue of healthcare inequality, making it essential to analyze the factors contributing to this gap and explore strategies for more inclusive health protection. A state-level health survey was conducted.
The survey covered 1,80,000 adults across urban and rural areas. Urban residents formed 55% of the sample (that is, 99,000 people) while rural residents made up 45% (that is, 81,000 people). In each area, coverage was classified under four heads – Public schemes, Private insurance, Employer-provided coverage, and Uninsured. In urban areas, Public coverage accounted for 28% of the urban population, Private for 22%, Employer for 18%, and the remaining 32% were Uninsured. In rural areas, where formal coverage is generally lower, Public coverage stood at 35%, Private at 10%, Employer at 8%, while 47% were Uninsured.
For this survey, “Insured” includes everyone covered by Public + Private + Employer schemes, and “Uninsured” indicates those with no coverage at all. Officials noted that public schemes remain the backbone of rural coverage, while employer and private plans are relatively more prevalent in urban centres. (250 words)