Question:
"Mere illegality of the strike does not per se spell unjustifiability" - Justice Krishna Iyer. Name the case.
"Mere illegality of the strike does not per se spell unjustifiability" - Justice Krishna Iyer. Name the case.
Show Hint
In the case of Associated Cement Ltd. Vs Their Workmen, it was established that the mere illegality of a strike does not automatically make it unjustifiable.
Updated On: Oct 31, 2025
- Chandramalai Estate Vs Its workmen
- Associated Cement Ltd., Vs Their workmen
- Gujarat Steel Tubes Vs Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabha
- Indian General Navigation of Railway Co. Ltd., Vs Their workmen
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is B
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the Case.
In the case of Associated Cement Ltd. Vs Their Workmen, Justice Krishna Iyer observed that the mere illegality of a strike does not automatically make it unjustifiable. This case emphasized the importance of context and reason for the strike, beyond its mere legality.
Step 2: Explanation of the options.
- (a) Chandramalai Estate Vs Its workmen: This is incorrect; this case is not related to the quoted statement.
- (b) Associated Cement Ltd., Vs Their workmen: This is the correct case, as it involves the statement by Justice Krishna Iyer regarding the illegality of strikes.
- (c) Gujarat Steel Tubes Vs Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabha: This is incorrect; the statement is not from this case.
- (d) Indian General Navigation of Railway Co. Ltd., Vs Their workmen: This is incorrect, as it does not pertain to the quoted statement.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Thus, the correct answer is (b) Associated Cement Ltd., Vs Their workmen.
In the case of Associated Cement Ltd. Vs Their Workmen, Justice Krishna Iyer observed that the mere illegality of a strike does not automatically make it unjustifiable. This case emphasized the importance of context and reason for the strike, beyond its mere legality.
Step 2: Explanation of the options.
- (a) Chandramalai Estate Vs Its workmen: This is incorrect; this case is not related to the quoted statement.
- (b) Associated Cement Ltd., Vs Their workmen: This is the correct case, as it involves the statement by Justice Krishna Iyer regarding the illegality of strikes.
- (c) Gujarat Steel Tubes Vs Gujarat Steel Tubes Mazdoor Sabha: This is incorrect; the statement is not from this case.
- (d) Indian General Navigation of Railway Co. Ltd., Vs Their workmen: This is incorrect, as it does not pertain to the quoted statement.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Thus, the correct answer is (b) Associated Cement Ltd., Vs Their workmen.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Labour Law
- Assertion (A): An employee can be deemed to be in continuous service for one year only if he has worked for 365 days in the preceding twelve months without any interruption.
Reason (R): Under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, continuous service may also include periods of interruption due to sickness, accident, leave, lay-off, strike, or lock-out not caused by the employee's fault.- AIBE - 2025
- Legal Studies
- Labour Law
Match List-I with List-II
List-I (Act) List-II (Year) (A) Minimum Wage Act (I) 1972 (B) Payment of Gratuity Act (II) 1948 (C) Industrial Dispute Act (III) 1936 (D) Payment of Wage Act (IV) 1947 Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
- From the point of Economic Development, which of the following statements is true
(A). Labour is a commodity
(B). Freedom of expression is essential to sustained progress
(C). Poverty anywhere constitutes danger of poverty everywhere
(D). India is a founder member of ILO
Choose the correct answer from the options given below: - Which of the following statements is true about the employee and employer relationship
(A). Lay-off is temporary
(B). Retrenchment is temporary
(C). Lay-off is permanent
(D). Retrenchment is permanent
Choose the correct answer from the options given below: - Which of the following is not a correct statement
View More Questions
Questions Asked in AIBE exam
- The grounds for decree for dissolution of marriage under Section 2 of the Dissolution of Muslim Marriages Act, 1939 are:
I. whereabouts of the husband have not been known for two years.
II. husband has been sentenced to imprisonment for a period of five years.
III. husband has failed to perform marital obligations for two years without reasonable cause.
IV. husband has neglected or failed to maintain his wife for one year.
Select the correct answer.- AIBE - 2025
- Family Laws
- A Statement is followed by two Conclusions, I and II.
Statement: According to the Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, the Government credits ₹15,000 to the Rehabilitation Fund for each child or adolescent for whom fine has been recovered from the employer. This amount may be deposited or invested, and the interest is also payable to the child or adolescent.
Conclusions:
I. The child or adolescent is entitled not only to the credited amount but also to the interest accrued on it.
II. The Government is not required to deposit any money other than what is collected as fines from the employer.
Which one is correct?- AIBE - 2025
- Labour & Industrial Law
- Consider the following statements about Article 32 of the Constitution and select the correct answer:
I. The Article is silent about the locus standi regarding who may approach the Court.
II. The Article is silent about the opposite party against whom relief may be granted.
III. The Article creates scope for even a sixth type of writ.- AIBE - 2025
- Constitutional Laws
- If a bailiff executes an eviction based on a civil court order later declared void for lack of jurisdiction, what protection does Section 78 of the Indian Penal Code provide?
- AIBE - 2025
- Indian Penal Code (IPC)
- Under Section 290(1) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, within how many days from the date of framing of charge can an accused file an application for plea bargaining?
- AIBE - 2025
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)
View More Questions