Match List - I with List - II.
The question involves matching the given coordination complexes with their magnetic susceptibility values. Magnetic susceptibility is a measure of how much a substance will become magnetized in an applied magnetic field. It is influenced by the number of unpaired electrons in the metal ion. Let's break down the problem step by step.
The magnetic susceptibility depends on the number of unpaired electrons in the metal ion's d-orbitals. The more unpaired electrons, the stronger the magnetic susceptibility. For transition metals, this can be predicted based on their oxidation states and electron configurations.
We are given four metal ions in different oxidation states:
Let's first determine the electron configurations of the metal ions in their given oxidation states:
Titanium (Ti) has an atomic number of 22. Its ground-state electron configuration is [Ar] 3d2 4s2. In the Ti3+ state, it loses three electrons, leading to the electron configuration [Ar] 3d1. This means Ti3+ has 1 unpaired electron, making it paramagnetic with a moderate magnetic susceptibility value.
Vanadium (V) has an atomic number of 23. Its ground-state electron configuration is [Ar] 3d3 4s2. In the V2+ state, it loses two electrons, giving the configuration [Ar] 3d5. This means V2+ has 5 unpaired electrons, resulting in a high magnetic susceptibility.
Nickel (Ni) has an atomic number of 28. Its electron configuration is [Ar] 3d8 4s2. In the Ni2+ state, it loses two electrons, leading to the configuration [Ar] 3d8. This gives Ni2+ 2 unpaired electrons, so it is paramagnetic, but with moderate magnetic susceptibility.
Scandium (Sc) has an atomic number of 21. Its electron configuration is [Ar] 3d1 4s2. In the Sc3+ state, it loses three electrons, leaving the configuration [Ar]. This results in no unpaired electrons, meaning Sc3+ is diamagnetic with zero magnetic susceptibility.
Now that we know the number of unpaired electrons for each metal ion, we can match the complexes with their corresponding magnetic susceptibility values:
The correct matching of List-I with List-II is:
This matches the correct answer.
A hydrocarbon which does not belong to the same homologous series of carbon compounds is
Let A be a 3 × 3 matrix such that \(\text{det}(A) = 5\). If \(\text{det}(3 \, \text{adj}(2A)) = 2^{\alpha \cdot 3^{\beta} \cdot 5^{\gamma}}\), then \( (\alpha + \beta + \gamma) \) is equal to: