Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This question requires matching different modes of fruit development with their classic botanical examples.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Let's match each statement in List-I to the correct example in List-II:
\[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{(A) Thalamus contributes to fruit formation: This describes an accessory or false fruit, where parts other than the ovary (like the thalamus or receptacle) form the main fleshy part. The (IV) Apple is a classic example of this, where the edible portion is the swollen thalamus. } \\ \bullet & \text{(B) Ovary forms fruit: This describes a true fruit, which develops solely from the ovary. The (I) Tomato is a true fruit (specifically, a berry) that develops from the plant's ovary. } \\ \bullet & \text{(C) Fruit develops without fertilisation: This process is called parthenocarpy. The (II) Banana is a well-known example of a naturally parthenocarpic fruit. } \\ \bullet & \text{(D) Fruit develops from inflorescence: This describes a multiple or composite fruit, which develops from the fusion of an entire flower cluster (inflorescence). The (III) Pineapple is a classic example, developing from a spike inflorescence. } \\ \end{array}\]
The correct matching is: A \(\rightarrow\) IV, B \(\rightarrow\) I, C \(\rightarrow\) II, D \(\rightarrow\) III.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The correct combination of matches is given in option 2.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |