Step 1: Understanding the model.
The given distribution is uniform over the symmetric interval \([- \theta, \theta]\).
Hence, the joint pdf is:
\[
L(\theta; x_1, \dots, x_n) =
\begin{cases}
(2\theta)^{-n}, & \text{if } -\theta \le x_i \le \theta \ \forall i, \\
0, & \text{otherwise.}
\end{cases}
\]
Step 2: Finding the MLE.
For the likelihood to be non-zero, we need \(\theta \ge \max_i |x_i|\).
Since \(L\) is decreasing in \(\theta\), the MLE is
\[
\hat{\theta} = \max_i |x_i|.
\]
Thus, option (B) is TRUE.
Step 3: Sufficiency and completeness.
The likelihood depends on the sample only through \(\max_i |x_i|\), so it is a sufficient statistic.
For the uniform family of this type, this statistic is also complete.
Hence, option (C) is TRUE.
Step 4: Distributional independence.
Since both \(R\) and \(S\) are scaled by \(\theta\) (i.e., \(R/\theta, S/\theta\) have distributions independent of \(\theta\)),
the ratio \(R/S\) also does not depend on \(\theta\).
Therefore, option (D) is TRUE.
Step 5: Analyze (A).
\((R, S)\) is not minimal sufficient because the joint pdf depends only on \(\max |X_i|\), not both endpoints separately.
Thus, (A) is FALSE.
Final Answer:
\[
\boxed{(B), (C), (D)}
\]