Question:

Legal Principle: No remedy lies in law where an injury is caused to a person without any infringement of his legal right.
Fact Situation: Ashutosh started a tuition Centre right next to the one being run for the past twenty years by Gulshan. After Ashutosh started his Centre, a large number of students shifted from Gulshan’s tuition Centre to Ashutosh’s Centre, forcing Gulshan to close down his establishment and suffer huge losses. Can Gulshan initiate legal action against Ashutosh?
Which of the following statements is the most appropriate in relation to the legal principle stated above?

Show Hint

In tort law, \textbf{damnum sine injuria} means loss without legal injury. Law protects legal rights, not mere economic interests affected by fair competition.
Updated On: Aug 14, 2025
  • Ashutosh must compensate Gulshan for his loss consequent to the start of the new tuition centre.
  • Gulshan cannot blame Ashutosh if he cannot retain his students.
  • Ashutosh has not violated any legal right of Gulshan, though students shifted to Ashutosh’s Centre and though Gulshan suffered loss, after he shut down his tuition Centre.
  • Gulshan should have improved his quality with lower fees to retain his students in the light of competition brought in by Ashutosh.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation


Step 1: Understanding the legal principle
- The principle clearly states that the law will not grant a remedy if there is no infringement of a person’s legal right.
- This means that mere loss or damage is not enough — there must be a violation of a legal right.
- This is connected to the Latin maxim \textit{damnum sine injuria} — damage without legal injury is not actionable.
Step 2: Applying the facts
- Ashutosh started a tuition centre in lawful competition with Gulshan.
- He did not interfere with Gulshan’s property, threaten students, or commit fraud.
- The students voluntarily chose to move to Ashutosh’s centre.
- Gulshan’s loss was a result of competition, not an infringement of a legal right.
Step 3: Linking facts with the principle
- Since Gulshan’s legal rights were not violated, the law does not provide him with any remedy.
- His loss, though financially significant, falls under damnum sine injuria.
- Therefore, there is no cause of action against Ashutosh.
Step 4: Conclusion
- The most appropriate answer is option (3), because it directly applies the principle that without legal injury, there can be no legal remedy.
\[ \boxed{\text{No legal action as there is no violation of legal rights.}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Law of Torts

View More Questions

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions