From Statement I:
We know $PB>RE$ and $BQ = ES$. These are comparisons of parts of $PQ$ and $RS$, but without knowing that $PB$ and $BQ$ are contiguous parts of $PQ$, and $RE$ and $ES$ are contiguous parts of $RS$, we cannot directly add them to compare $PQ$ and $RS$. So Statement I alone is insufficient.
From Statement II:
We are told that $B$ lies on $PQ$ and $E$ lies on $RS$, but this only gives us position, not length comparisons. So Statement II alone is also insufficient.
Combining Statements I and II:
From Statement II, we confirm $PQ = PB + BQ$ and $RS = RE + ES$. From Statement I, we have $PB>RE$ and $BQ = ES$. Adding these inequalities:
\[
PQ = PB + BQ>RE + ES = RS
\]
Thus $PQ>RS$. Therefore, both statements together are sufficient.