Question

: In this question, there is a statement followed by three courses of action numbered I, II and III. Assuming everything in the statement to be true, which of the three courses of action is logical to follow?
Statement : Lack if coordination University, it colleges and various authorities has resulted in students ousted from one college seeking migration to another. Course of action:
I. If a student is ousted from a college, the information should be sent to all other colleges of the University.
II. The admission to all colleges of the University should be centralized at the University.
III. A separate section should be created for taking action against students indulging in antisocial activities.

• A. Only III follows
• B. Only II and III follow
• C. Only I follows
• D. Only II follows

Answer 1

The Correct Option is B

Statement I suggests that sharing information between colleges about students who have been ousted, which can help prevent problematic students from moving to other colleges, making it a logical step.

Statement II suggests that centralizing admissions, which could streamline processes and improve coordination, making it relevant to the problem.

Statement III focuses on students indulging in antisocial activities, which addresses a specific issue but may not directly tackle the overall problem of lack of coordination.

So,

Statement II Centralizing admissions directly addresses coordination issues.

Statement III Creating a section to address antisocial behavior is also a proactive solution, even though it focuses on a subset of the problem.

The correct option is (B): Only II and III follow