Kshatriya Rulers: Shastras and Kshatriyas: According to ancient shastras, the position of king was usually reserved for the Kshatriya varna. Examples: Numerous rulers from the major dynasties such as Mahapadmananda, Ajatshatru, etc.
Brahmanical View of Kshatriyas: According to Brahmanical texts, the kings ought to have been Kshatriyas, which indicates the importance of the varna system.
Kshatriya Rulers: Major dynasties like the Pandavas, Kauravas, Pratiharas, Guptas, Palas, and Rashtrakutas all claimed to be from the Kshatriya Varna.
Following the Shastras: They also followed texts such as Manusmriti and Dharmashastras. These were important legal and social texts of the time.
Non-Kshatriya Rulers: Different Origins: Many important ruling lineages had different origins that were probably non-kshatriya.
Mauryas' Social Background: The social background of the Mauryas has been debated, but in many Brahmanical texts, they are described as having low origins.
Shungas and Kanvas: The Shungas and Kanvas, who were the immediate successors to the Mauryas were Brahmins, and hence were non-kshatriya rulers.
Shakas: The Shakas came from central Asia, and were regarded as mlechhas (foreigners), and were hence, not considered kshatriyas.
Satavahana Ruler: The Satavahana rulers often claimed to be Brahmins, which is different from the Kshatriya varna.
Difficulties of Varna System: To fit the rulers in a framework of a caste system was often difficult, because there were many rulers of different backgrounds.
Power and Resources: Those rulers who could muster power, resources and support could become king, irrespective of their varna. This indicates that the varna system was not rigid.
Other Relevant Point: Any other relevant point from the chapter.
Read the following source carefully and answer the questions that follow:
The orders of the king
Thus speaks king Devanampiya Piyadassi: In the past, there were no arrangements for disposing affairs, nor for receiving regular reports. But I have made the following (arrangement). Pativedakas should report to me about the affairs of the people at all times, anywhere, whether I am eating, in the inner apartment, in the bedroom, in the cow pen, being carried (possibly in a palanquin), or in the garden. And I will dispose of the affairs of the people everywhere.
Rupal, Shanu and Trisha were partners in a firm sharing profits and losses in the ratio of 4:3:1. Their Balance Sheet as at 31st March, 2024 was as follows:
(i) Trisha's share of profit was entirely taken by Shanu.
(ii) Fixed assets were found to be undervalued by Rs 2,40,000.
(iii) Stock was revalued at Rs 2,00,000.
(iv) Goodwill of the firm was valued at Rs 8,00,000 on Trisha's retirement.
(v) The total capital of the new firm was fixed at Rs 16,00,000 which was adjusted according to the new profit sharing ratio of the partners. For this necessary cash was paid off or brought in by the partners as the case may be.
Prepare Revaluation Account and Partners' Capital Accounts.