Kshatriya Rulers: Shastras and Kshatriyas: According to ancient shastras, the position of king was usually reserved for the Kshatriya varna. Examples: Numerous rulers from the major dynasties such as Mahapadmananda, Ajatshatru, etc.
Brahmanical View of Kshatriyas: According to Brahmanical texts, the kings ought to have been Kshatriyas, which indicates the importance of the varna system.
Kshatriya Rulers: Major dynasties like the Pandavas, Kauravas, Pratiharas, Guptas, Palas, and Rashtrakutas all claimed to be from the Kshatriya Varna.
Following the Shastras: They also followed texts such as Manusmriti and Dharmashastras. These were important legal and social texts of the time.
Non-Kshatriya Rulers: Different Origins: Many important ruling lineages had different origins that were probably non-kshatriya.
Mauryas' Social Background: The social background of the Mauryas has been debated, but in many Brahmanical texts, they are described as having low origins.
Shungas and Kanvas: The Shungas and Kanvas, who were the immediate successors to the Mauryas were Brahmins, and hence were non-kshatriya rulers.
Shakas: The Shakas came from central Asia, and were regarded as mlechhas (foreigners), and were hence, not considered kshatriyas.
Satavahana Ruler: The Satavahana rulers often claimed to be Brahmins, which is different from the Kshatriya varna.
Difficulties of Varna System: To fit the rulers in a framework of a caste system was often difficult, because there were many rulers of different backgrounds.
Power and Resources: Those rulers who could muster power, resources and support could become king, irrespective of their varna. This indicates that the varna system was not rigid.
Other Relevant Point: Any other relevant point from the chapter.
Read the following source carefully and answer the questions that follow:
The orders of the king
Thus speaks king Devanampiya Piyadassi: In the past, there were no arrangements for disposing affairs, nor for receiving regular reports. But I have made the following (arrangement). Pativedakas should report to me about the affairs of the people at all times, anywhere, whether I am eating, in the inner apartment, in the bedroom, in the cow pen, being carried (possibly in a palanquin), or in the garden. And I will dispose of the affairs of the people everywhere.
A school is organizing a debate competition with participants as speakers and judges. $ S = \{S_1, S_2, S_3, S_4\} $ where $ S = \{S_1, S_2, S_3, S_4\} $ represents the set of speakers. The judges are represented by the set: $ J = \{J_1, J_2, J_3\} $ where $ J = \{J_1, J_2, J_3\} $ represents the set of judges. Each speaker can be assigned only one judge. Let $ R $ be a relation from set $ S $ to $ J $ defined as: $ R = \{(x, y) : \text{speaker } x \text{ is judged by judge } y, x \in S, y \in J\} $.