Comprehension
In recent years, scholars have begun to use social science tools to analyze court opinions. These
scholars have justifiably criticized traditional legal research for its focus on a few cases chosen for
their perceived doctrinal importance, arguing that such research may distort our understanding
of the law. Social scientists endeavor to study court opinions systematically, analyzing samples
of cases that are selected randomly or that constitute the entire universe of cases within certain
bounds. However, social science approaches themselves have limitations. By focusing primarily
on the influence of factors such as the identity of the judge or the ideological orientation of
the court, social scientists may overlook the influence of legal doctrine itself. Their research
designs, which usually involve analyzing the quantitative relationship between characteristics
of cases and their outcomes, are good at detecting the influence of factors that can be easily
quantified but not as good at assessing the influence of factors such as the reasoning of the
judge. Social science approaches have also been criticized for ignoring the distinction between
the holding of a case (the part of the opinion that is legally binding) and the dicta (nonbinding
statements). Finally, these approaches are better suited to analyzing the decisions of appellate
courts, which generally issue written opinions, than the decisions of trial courts, which often
do not.
Question: 1
The primary purpose of the passage is to
The primary purpose of the passage is to
Show Hint
To find the primary purpose, look at the overall structure. Often, a passage will introduce a topic, explain its context or benefits, and then provide a critique or analysis. The main purpose is to present this complete picture.
Updated On: Sep 30, 2025
- describe a new approach to analyzing court opinions and discuss some criticisms of this approach
- argue that traditional legal research is superior to social science approaches to analyzing court opinions
- explain the limitations of using quantitative methods to analyze court opinions
- compare the goals of traditional legal research with those of social science approaches to analyzing court opinions
- advocate the use of social science tools in the analysis of trial court decisions
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This question asks for the primary purpose of the passage. We need to analyze the overall structure and content to determine the author's main goal.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The passage begins by introducing a "new" method: using social science tools to analyze court opinions.
It then briefly explains the benefits of this approach over traditional legal research.
The majority of the passage, however, is dedicated to outlining the "limitations" and "criticisms" of this new social science approach (e.g., overlooking legal doctrine, ignoring holding/dicta distinction, unsuitability for trial courts).
Therefore, the passage describes the new approach and then discusses its criticisms.
Let's evaluate the options:
(A) This option perfectly matches our analysis. It mentions both the description of the new approach and the discussion of its criticisms.
(B) The passage does not argue that the traditional method is superior; it points out flaws in both.
(C) This is too narrow. The passage discusses several limitations, not just those of quantitative methods.
(D) While some comparison is made, the primary focus is on the new approach and its flaws, not a balanced comparison of goals.
(E) This is the opposite of what the passage states. It says these approaches are *not* well-suited for trial courts.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The primary purpose is to describe the social science approach to analyzing court opinions and to detail its limitations. This corresponds to option (A).
This question asks for the primary purpose of the passage. We need to analyze the overall structure and content to determine the author's main goal.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The passage begins by introducing a "new" method: using social science tools to analyze court opinions.
It then briefly explains the benefits of this approach over traditional legal research.
The majority of the passage, however, is dedicated to outlining the "limitations" and "criticisms" of this new social science approach (e.g., overlooking legal doctrine, ignoring holding/dicta distinction, unsuitability for trial courts).
Therefore, the passage describes the new approach and then discusses its criticisms.
Let's evaluate the options:
(A) This option perfectly matches our analysis. It mentions both the description of the new approach and the discussion of its criticisms.
(B) The passage does not argue that the traditional method is superior; it points out flaws in both.
(C) This is too narrow. The passage discusses several limitations, not just those of quantitative methods.
(D) While some comparison is made, the primary focus is on the new approach and its flaws, not a balanced comparison of goals.
(E) This is the opposite of what the passage states. It says these approaches are *not* well-suited for trial courts.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The primary purpose is to describe the social science approach to analyzing court opinions and to detail its limitations. This corresponds to option (A).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2
The passage suggests which of the following about traditional legal research?
The passage suggests which of the following about traditional legal research?
Show Hint
For questions that ask what a passage "suggests," look for direct criticisms or praises of the subject in question. The correct answer is often a logical rewording of one of these specific points.
Updated On: Sep 30, 2025
- It focuses primarily on the decisions of appellate courts.
- It is not well suited to analyzing the influence of legal doctrine.
- It may not accurately reflect the state of the law.
- It is more likely than social science approaches to distinguish between holding and dicta.
- It is less biased than social science approaches with regard to the selection of cases.
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This is an inference question. We need to find the statement about traditional legal research that is most strongly supported by the text.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The passage criticizes traditional legal research for its "focus on a few cases chosen for their perceived doctrinal importance." It then argues that this selective focus "may distort our understanding of the law."
Let's evaluate the options based on this information:
(A) The passage doesn't specify which courts traditional research focuses on.
(B) The passage implies the opposite; traditional research is focused on "doctrinal importance."
(C) This is a direct paraphrase of the idea that this research method "may distort our understanding of the law." If the understanding is distorted, it is not accurately reflecting the state of the law. This is a strong inference.
(D) The passage criticizes the social science approach for ignoring this distinction but makes no such claim about the traditional approach. We cannot infer that the traditional approach is better at it.
(E) The passage states the opposite. It criticizes the traditional approach for its biased selection of cases ("a few cases chosen for their perceived doctrinal importance") and praises the social science approach for being more systematic ("selected randomly or that constitute the entire universe").
Step 3: Final Answer:
The passage directly suggests that the biased case selection of traditional research can lead to a distorted view, meaning it may not accurately reflect the law. This corresponds to option (C).
This is an inference question. We need to find the statement about traditional legal research that is most strongly supported by the text.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The passage criticizes traditional legal research for its "focus on a few cases chosen for their perceived doctrinal importance." It then argues that this selective focus "may distort our understanding of the law."
Let's evaluate the options based on this information:
(A) The passage doesn't specify which courts traditional research focuses on.
(B) The passage implies the opposite; traditional research is focused on "doctrinal importance."
(C) This is a direct paraphrase of the idea that this research method "may distort our understanding of the law." If the understanding is distorted, it is not accurately reflecting the state of the law. This is a strong inference.
(D) The passage criticizes the social science approach for ignoring this distinction but makes no such claim about the traditional approach. We cannot infer that the traditional approach is better at it.
(E) The passage states the opposite. It criticizes the traditional approach for its biased selection of cases ("a few cases chosen for their perceived doctrinal importance") and praises the social science approach for being more systematic ("selected randomly or that constitute the entire universe").
Step 3: Final Answer:
The passage directly suggests that the biased case selection of traditional research can lead to a distorted view, meaning it may not accurately reflect the law. This corresponds to option (C).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 3
According to the passage, social science approaches to analyzing court opinions have been criticized for which of the following?
According to the passage, social science approaches to analyzing court opinions have been criticized for which of the following?
Show Hint
When a question asks "According to the passage," you should be able to physically point to the sentence or phrase in the text that directly states the information. The correct answer is often a close paraphrase of that text.
Updated On: Sep 30, 2025
- Focusing too much on the identity of the judge
- Failing to account for the influence of legal doctrine
- Focusing too much on the decisions of trial courts
- Analyzing too few cases
- Giving too much weight to the reasoning of the judge
Hide Solution
Verified By Collegedunia
The Correct Option is B
Solution and Explanation
Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
This is a detail question. We need to find a specific criticism of social science approaches that is explicitly mentioned in the passage.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The passage lists several limitations of social science approaches. Let's find the sentence that addresses the options. The passage states: "By focusing primarily on the influence of factors such as the identity of the judge or the ideological orientation of the court, social scientists may overlook the influence of legal doctrine itself."
Let's evaluate the options:
(A) The passage says this approach *does* focus on the identity of the judge, but this is presented as a feature that leads to a flaw, not the criticism itself. The criticism is what this focus causes them to miss.
(B) This is a direct paraphrase of the criticism mentioned in the passage ("may overlook the influence of legal doctrine").
(C) The passage states the opposite: these approaches are "better suited to analyzing the decisions of appellate courts" and are not well-suited for trial courts.
(D) The passage states the opposite: social scientists analyze cases "systematically, analyzing samples of cases that are selected randomly or that constitute the entire universe," which contrasts with the "few cases" of traditional research.
(E) The passage states the opposite: these approaches are "not as good at assessing the influence of factors such as the reasoning of the judge."
Step 3: Final Answer:
The passage explicitly states that social science approaches have been criticized for overlooking or failing to account for the influence of legal doctrine. This corresponds to option (B).
This is a detail question. We need to find a specific criticism of social science approaches that is explicitly mentioned in the passage.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The passage lists several limitations of social science approaches. Let's find the sentence that addresses the options. The passage states: "By focusing primarily on the influence of factors such as the identity of the judge or the ideological orientation of the court, social scientists may overlook the influence of legal doctrine itself."
Let's evaluate the options:
(A) The passage says this approach *does* focus on the identity of the judge, but this is presented as a feature that leads to a flaw, not the criticism itself. The criticism is what this focus causes them to miss.
(B) This is a direct paraphrase of the criticism mentioned in the passage ("may overlook the influence of legal doctrine").
(C) The passage states the opposite: these approaches are "better suited to analyzing the decisions of appellate courts" and are not well-suited for trial courts.
(D) The passage states the opposite: social scientists analyze cases "systematically, analyzing samples of cases that are selected randomly or that constitute the entire universe," which contrasts with the "few cases" of traditional research.
(E) The passage states the opposite: these approaches are "not as good at assessing the influence of factors such as the reasoning of the judge."
Step 3: Final Answer:
The passage explicitly states that social science approaches have been criticized for overlooking or failing to account for the influence of legal doctrine. This corresponds to option (B).
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Top Questions on Reading Comprehension
- This passage was written in 1984.
It is now possible to hear a recording of Caruso’s singing that is far superior to any made during his lifetime. A decades-old wax-cylinder recording of this great operatic tenor has been digitized, and the digitized signal has been processed by computer to remove the extraneous sound, or ”noise,” introduced by the now ”ancient” wax-cylinder recording process. Although this digital technique needs improvement, it represents a new and superior way of recording and processing sound which overcomes many of the limitations of analog recording. In analog recording systems, the original sound is represented as a continuous waveform created by variations in the sound’s amplitude over time. When analog playback systems reproduce this waveform, however, they invariably introduce distortions. First, the waveform produced during playback differs somewhat from the original waveform. Second, the medium that stores the analog recording creates noise during playback which gets added to the recorded sounds. ... as long as the numbers remain recognizable, the original waveform will be reconstructed with little loss in quality. However, because the waveform is continuous, while its digital representation is composed of discrete numbers, it is impossible for digital systems to avoid some distortion. One kind of distortion, called ”sampling error,” occurs if the sound is sampled (i.e., its amplitude is measured) too infrequently, so that the amplitude changes more than one quantum (the smallest change in amplitude measured by the digital system) between samplings. In effect, the sound is changing too quickly for the system to record it accurately. A second form of distortion is ”quantizing error,” which arises when the amplitude being measured is not a whole number of quanta, forcing the digital recorder to round off. Over the long term, these errors are random, and the noise produced (a background buzzing) is similar to analog noise except that it only occurs when recorded sounds are being reproduced.- GMAT - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
- In the field of Native American history, scholars have increasingly recognized the need to un- derstand indigenous cultures and perspectives. However, achieving this goal is difficult, partly because Native American oral traditions are rarely accorded the same legitimacy as written accounts. Historian Joanne Rappaport observes that written sources are privileged in histori- cal scholarship, and she argues that this privileging reflects a view that literacy is superior to orality. Rappaport suggests that the link between writing and truth is historically contingent, arising from the encounter between Native Americans and Spanish colonizers. She points out that while the Spanish privileged written documents as records of events, the Native Americans of the Andes regarded oral traditions and ritual performances as the principal means of record- ing the past. When Andean societies were forced to adopt alphabetic writing, they adapted it to meet their needs. For example, indigenous authors used alphabetic writing not only to record events but also to express Andean understandings of the cosmos. Moreover, Andean communities continued to rely on oral traditions and ritual performances to transmit historical knowledge. Rappaport argues that scholars should recognize the parity of oral and written modes of transmitting knowledge and strive to incorporate both into their historical accounts.
- GMAT - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
- Although economic analysis of collective bargaining has traditionally focused on wages, recent studies have increasingly focused on the effects of unionization on fringe benefits such as pen- sions and health insurance. Because the costs of providing fringe benefits are tax deductible for employers, fringe benefits are effectively subsidized by the government. This tax treatment creates an incentive for employers to increase the proportion of employee compensation that is paid in the form of fringe benefits. However, not all workers value fringe benefits equally. Since the value that workers place on fringe benefits is likely to rise with their income (because the tax savings associated with fringe benefits increase with income), higher-income workers are likely to prefer a greater proportion of their compensation in the form of fringe benefits than are lower-income workers. Unions, which typically represent lower-income workers, should therefore be expected to oppose the substitution of fringe benefits for wages. However, unions often support such substitutions. One explanation for this puzzling behavior is that unions take into account the preferences not just of current members but also of potential members, who are typically younger and higher-income than current members. Another explanation is that unions are willing to accept lower wages in exchange for fringe benefits because fringe benefits help to retain workers and reduce labor turnover, thereby increasing the union’s bargaining power.
- GMAT - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
- Recent studies of the gender gap in entrepreneurship have produced somewhat conflicting re- sults. Some studies suggest that the gender gap is narrowing, while others suggest that it is widening. One difficulty in interpreting these results is that the studies often measure en- trepreneurship in different ways. Some studies define entrepreneurs as those who start their own businesses, while others define them as those who own or manage businesses. Moreover, studies vary in their focus, with some examining the proportion of entrepreneurs who are women and others examining the proportion of women who are entrepreneurs. Despite these differ- ences, however, the studies generally agree that women are less likely than men to become entrepreneurs. Several factors have been proposed to explain this gender gap. Some scholars point to differences in access to financial capital, arguing that women are less likely than men to be able to obtain the funding needed to start or grow a business. Others point to differences in human capital, suggesting that women are less likely than men to have the education, expe- rience, and skills needed for entrepreneurship. Still others point to differences in social capital, arguing that women are less likely than men to have access to the networks and connections that can facilitate entrepreneurial success.
- GMAT - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
- In studying the evolution of vertebrae, biologists have often focused on the notochord, a flexible rod found in the embryos of all vertebrates. The notochord appears early in development and is later replaced by the vertebral column, or spine. Because the notochord is essential for the formation of the spine, it has been argued that the evolution of the spine must have followed the evolution of the notochord. However, recent research on the lancelet, a small invertebrate chordate, challenges this view. Lancelets are thought to resemble the ancestors of vertebrates, and they possess a notochord but lack vertebrae. This suggests that the notochord evolved before the spine. Moreover, studies of lancelet development have shown that the notochord is not required for the formation of the tissues that give rise to the spine in vertebrates. Instead, the notochord appears to play a role in organizing the development of other structures, such as the nerve cord and the muscles. These findings suggest that the notochord and the spine evolved independently, with the notochord arising first to serve functions other than spinal development. The spine may have evolved later as a means of providing support and protection for the body.
- GMAT - 2025
- Verbal Reasoning
- Reading Comprehension
View More Questions
Questions Asked in GMAT exam
- If a and b are positive integers satisfying \(4a + 3b = 17\) and \( \frac{(5ab)!}{3^p} \) is an integer, then the maximum value of p is
- GMAT - 2025
- Basic Arithmetic
- You purchase a car making a down payment of 3,000 and 6 monthly payments of $225. How much have you paid so far for the car?
- GMAT - 2025
- Basic Arithmetic
- You need to purchase a textbook for nursing school. The book cost 80.00, and the sales tax where you are purchasing the book is 8.25%. You have $100. How much change will you receive back?
- GMAT - 2025
- Percentages
- If \( 1 < x < y < z \), which of the following has the greatest value?
- GMAT - 2025
- Algebra
- The price of a candy bar is 1.00. The price of a ten pack of the same candy bar is 7.40. The ten pack of candy bars is what percentage cheaper then purchasing ten candy bars individually?
- GMAT - 2025
- Percentages
View More Questions