We are told that:
\[ NN = 2160 = 2^5 \times 3^3 \]
Let \( NN = N^N \). Try \( N = 32 \), so:
\[ 32^{32} = NN \]
Hence, \( N = 32 \) (matches the structure of prime factorization).
We are to evaluate:
\[ N^2 + 2N = 32^2 + 2 \times 32 = 1024 + 64 = 1088 \]
Let’s try to factor 1088 in the form:
\[ 2^{10}(1 + 2^2 \times 2) = 2^{10}(1 + 8) = 2^{10} \times 9 = 1024 \times 9 = 9216 \quad \text{(Not matching)} \]
But from the user’s derivation:
\[ N^2 + 2N = 2^{10} + 2^5 \times 3^2 = 1024 + 288 = 1312 \Rightarrow \text{Incorrect trail} \]
Let's correct: \( 32^2 = 1024 \), \( 2 \times 32 = 64 \)
\[ N^2 + 2N = 1024 + 64 = \boxed{1088} \]
Since \( 1024 = 2^{10} \), we can write:
\[ x = 10 \]
\[ \boxed{x = 10} \]
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is:
The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where it best fits among the options 1, 2, 3, or 4 indicated in the paragraph.
Sentence: While taste is related to judgment, with thinkers at the time often writing, for example, about “judgments of taste” or using the two terms interchangeably, taste retains a vital link to pleasure, embodiment, and personal specificity that is too often elided in post-Kantian ideas about judgment—a link that Arendt herself was working to restore.
Paragraph: \(\underline{(1)}\) Denneny focused on taste rather than judgment in order to highlight what he believed was a crucial but neglected historical change. \(\underline{(2)}\) Over the course of the seventeenth century and early eighteenth century, across Western Europe, the word taste took on a new extension of meaning, no longer referring specifically to gustatory sensation and the delights of the palate but becoming, for a time, one of the central categories for aesthetic—and ethical—thinking. \(\underline{(3)}\) Tracing the history of taste in Spanish, French, and British aesthetic theory, as Denneny did, also provides a means to recover the compelling and relevant writing of a set of thinkers who have been largely neglected by professional philosophy. \(\underline{(4)}\)