To solve this problem, we need to identify the correct body from which an appeal can be made to the State Commission within the specified timeframe based on facts or law. The options given are:
The question states that any party not satisfied with the order can appeal to the State Commission. This suggests that the initial order must have been made by a lower authority which is being appealed. In consumer protection terms and typical business studies contexts, the hierarchy is as follows: the District Commission handles initial cases, and appeals from its orders go to the State Commission. Therefore, since the appeal is to the State Commission, the order must have come from the District Commission.
Accordingly, the correct answer is: District Commission
Correct Answer: (1) District Commission
The statement describes a situation where a party can appeal against an order to the State Commission on the grounds of facts or law within a period of forty-five days from the date of the order. This aligns with the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which allows an appeal to the State Commission from an order of the District Commission
List-I (Marks) | List-II (Product) |
(A) ISI Mark | (I) Electrical goods |
(B) FPO Mark | (II) Food Products |
(C) Hallmark | (III) Jewellery |
(D) Agmark | (IV) Agricultural Products |