Step 1: Define radioactive half-life (\(t_{1/2}\)).
The half-life is the time required for a quantity of a radioactive substance to be reduced to half of its initial value.
Step 2: State the formula relating half-life and the decay constant.
Radioactive decay is a first-order process. The relationship between the half-life and the decay constant (\(\lambda\)) is:
\[ t_{1/2} = \frac{\ln(2)}{\lambda} \]
Step 3: Analyze the relationship.
From the formula, we can see two things:
1. The half-life (\(t_{1/2}\)) is inversely proportional to the decay constant (\(\lambda\)).
2. The formula does not contain any terms for the initial or final concentration/amount of the substance. This means the half-life is independent of these quantities.
Conclusion: The half-life is independent of the initial concentration and inversely proportional to the decay constant.
Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion (A) and the other is labelled as Reason (R).
Assertion (A): The density of the copper ($^{64}Cu$) nucleus is greater than that of the carbon ($^{12}C$) nucleus.
Reason (R): The nucleus of mass number A has a radius proportional to $A^{1/3}$.
In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
\[ \begin{array}{|l|l|} \hline \text{LIST-I} & \text{LIST-II} \\ \hline A. \ ^{236}_{92} U \rightarrow ^{94}_{38} Sr + ^{140}_{54} Xe + 2n & \text{I. Chemical Reaction} \\ \hline B. \ 2H_2 + O_2 \rightarrow 2H_2O & \text{II. Fusion with +ve Q value} \\ \hline C. \ ^3_1 H + ^2_1 H \rightarrow ^4_2 He + n & \text{III. Fission} \\ \hline D. \ ^1_1 H + ^3_1 H \rightarrow ^4_2 H + \gamma & \text{IV. Fusion with -ve Q value} \\ \hline \end{array} \]
Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |