Step 1: Initial situation
The container has 10 litres of orange juice initially. Let the jug capacity be \(x\) litres.
Step 2: After the first replacement
- Orange juice removed = \(x\). Remaining orange juice = \(10 - x\).
- Pineapple juice added = \(x\).
So, mixture now: Orange = \(10 - x\), Pineapple = \(x\). Total = 10 litres.
Step 3: After the second replacement
When another jug of \(x\) litres is removed, the fraction of orange juice in the mixture is: \[ \frac{10 - x}{10}, \quad \text{and fraction of pineapple juice} = \frac{x}{10}. \] So, in \(x\) litres removed: - Orange removed = \(\frac{10-x}{10} \times x = \frac{x(10-x)}{10}\).
- Pineapple removed = \(\frac{x}{10} \times x = \frac{x^2}{10}\).
Step 4: Remaining after removal
Remaining orange = \((10 - x) - \frac{x(10-x)}{10} = (10-x)\left(1 - \frac{x}{10}\right) = \frac{(10-x)^2}{10}\).
Remaining pineapple = \(x - \frac{x^2}{10} = \frac{x(10-x)}{10}\).
Step 5: After refilling with pineapple juice
Pineapple increases by \(x\).
So, pineapple = \(\frac{x(10-x)}{10} + x = \frac{x(10-x) + 10x}{10} = \frac{x(20-x)}{10}\).
Step 6: Condition for equality
We need: \[ \frac{(10-x)^2}{10} = \frac{x(20-x)}{10}. \] \[ (10-x)^2 = x(20-x). \] \[ 100 - 20x + x^2 = 20x - x^2. \] \[ 2x^2 - 40x + 100 = 0. \] \[ x^2 - 20x + 50 = 0. \] Step 7: Solve quadratic
\[ x = \frac{20 \pm \sqrt{400 - 200}}{2} = \frac{20 \pm \sqrt{200}}{2} = \frac{20 \pm 10\sqrt{2}}{2}. \] \[ x = 10 \pm 5\sqrt{2}. \] Numerical values: - \(x = 10 - 5\sqrt{2} \approx 10 - 7.07 = 2.93\). - \(x = 10 + 5\sqrt{2} \approx 17.07\) (not possible since jug < 10 litres). So, valid jug size \(x \approx 2.93\). Step 8: Compare with options
This lies in the range \(> 2.5\) and \(\leq 3\). Hence, the correct option is (D). \[ \boxed{2.93 \, \text{litres (approx.)}} \]
Health insurance plays a vital role in ensuring financial protection and access to quality healthcare. In India, however, the extent and nature of health insurance coverage vary significantly between urban and rural areas. While urban populations often have better access to organized insurance schemes, employer-provided coverage, and awareness about health policies, rural populations face challenges such as limited outreach of insurance schemes, inadequate infrastructure, and lower awareness levels. This urban-rural divide in health insurance coverage highlights the broader issue of healthcare inequality, making it essential to analyze the factors contributing to this gap and explore strategies for more inclusive health protection. A state-level health survey was conducted.
The survey covered 1,80,000 adults across urban and rural areas. Urban residents formed 55% of the sample (that is, 99,000 people) while rural residents made up 45% (that is, 81,000 people). In each area, coverage was classified under four heads – Public schemes, Private insurance, Employer-provided coverage, and Uninsured. In urban areas, Public coverage accounted for 28% of the urban population, Private for 22%, Employer for 18%, and the remaining 32% were Uninsured. In rural areas, where formal coverage is generally lower, Public coverage stood at 35%, Private at 10%, Employer at 8%, while 47% were Uninsured.
For this survey, “Insured” includes everyone covered by Public + Private + Employer schemes, and “Uninsured” indicates those with no coverage at all. Officials noted that public schemes remain the backbone of rural coverage, while employer and private plans are relatively more prevalent in urban centres. (250 words)