Given the equations:
(1) \(x^{2018} y^{2017} = \frac{1}{2}\)
(2) \(x^{2016} y^{2019} = 8\)
We aim to find the value of \(x^2 + y^3\). Let us solve the problem step-by-step:
First, divide equation (1) by equation (2):
\(\frac{x^{2018} y^{2017}}{x^{2016} y^{2019}} = \frac{\frac{1}{2}}{8}\)
Simplifying the left side:
\(x^2 \cdot y^{-2} = \frac{1}{16}\)
This implies:
\(\frac{x^2}{y^2} = \frac{1}{16}\) ⇒ \(x^2 = \frac{y^2}{16}\)
From here, express \(x^2\) in terms of \(y\):
\(x^2 = \frac{y^2}{16}\)
Since we know \(x^2 = \frac{1}{16} y^2\), substitute into one of the equations to find specific values. Consider equation (2):
\((x^2)^{1008} \cdot y^{2016} = 8\)
Substitute \(x^2 = \frac{y^2}{16}\) into the expression:
\(\left(\frac{y^2}{16}\right)^{1008} \cdot y^{2016} = 8\)
This simplifies to:
\(\frac{y^{2016}}{16^{1008}} \cdot y^{2016} = 8\)
So:
\(\frac{y^{4032}}{16^{1008}} = 8\)
Thus, simplifying:
\(y^{4032} = 8 \times 16^{1008} = 2^3 \times (2^4)^{1008}\)
Therefore:
\(y^{4032} = 2^3 \times 2^{4032} = 2^{4035}\)
Solve for \(y\):
\(y = 2\)
Substitute \(y = 2\) into \(x^2 = \frac{y^2}{16}\):
\(x^2 = \frac{4}{16} = \frac{1}{4}\)
Therefore:
\(x = \frac{1}{2}\)
Now compute \(x^2 + y^3\):
\(\frac{1}{4} + 8 = \frac{1}{4} + \frac{32}{4} = \frac{33}{4}\)
The value of \(x^2 + y^3\) is:
\(\boxed{\frac{33}{4}}\)
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is:
The given sentence is missing in the paragraph below. Decide where it best fits among the options 1, 2, 3, or 4 indicated in the paragraph.
Sentence: While taste is related to judgment, with thinkers at the time often writing, for example, about “judgments of taste” or using the two terms interchangeably, taste retains a vital link to pleasure, embodiment, and personal specificity that is too often elided in post-Kantian ideas about judgment—a link that Arendt herself was working to restore.
Paragraph: \(\underline{(1)}\) Denneny focused on taste rather than judgment in order to highlight what he believed was a crucial but neglected historical change. \(\underline{(2)}\) Over the course of the seventeenth century and early eighteenth century, across Western Europe, the word taste took on a new extension of meaning, no longer referring specifically to gustatory sensation and the delights of the palate but becoming, for a time, one of the central categories for aesthetic—and ethical—thinking. \(\underline{(3)}\) Tracing the history of taste in Spanish, French, and British aesthetic theory, as Denneny did, also provides a means to recover the compelling and relevant writing of a set of thinkers who have been largely neglected by professional philosophy. \(\underline{(4)}\)