Assertion (A): In photoelectric effect, on increasing the intensity of incident light, the stopping potential increases.
Reason (R): Increase in intensity of light increases the rate of photoelectrons emitted, provided the frequency of incident light is greater than the threshold frequency.
The photoelectric effect is governed by Einstein’s photoelectric equation:
\[ K_{\text{max}} = h\nu - \phi \]
where \( K_{\text{max}} \) is the maximum kinetic energy of emitted photoelectrons, \( h \) is Planck’s constant, \( \nu \) is the frequency of the incident light, and \( \phi \) is the work function of the metal. The stopping potential \( V_0 \) is related to \( K_{\text{max}} \) as:
\[ eV_0 = K_{\text{max}} = h\nu - \phi \]
Step 1: Analyze the effect of intensity on stopping potential.
From the equation \( eV_0 = h\nu - \phi \), we see that stopping potential depends only on the frequency \( \nu \) of the incident light, not on its intensity. Therefore, increasing the intensity of light does not increase the stopping potential. The stopping potential remains the same if the frequency is unchanged.
Step 2: Analyze the Reason (R).
When the intensity of light increases, the number of photons incident per second on the metal surface increases. If each photon has energy greater than the work function (\( h\nu > \phi \)), more electrons are emitted per unit time. Hence, the rate of photoelectron emission increases with intensity.
Step 3: Evaluate the truth of A and R.
Final Answer: Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true.
Consider the following two reactions A and B: 
The numerical value of [molar mass of $x$ + molar mass of $y$] is ___.
Consider an A.P. $a_1,a_2,\ldots,a_n$; $a_1>0$. If $a_2-a_1=-\dfrac{3}{4}$, $a_n=\dfrac{1}{4}a_1$, and \[ \sum_{i=1}^{n} a_i=\frac{525}{2}, \] then $\sum_{i=1}^{17} a_i$ is equal to
