To determine the correct answer, we need to analyze the given assertion (A) and reason (R) separately and then determine their relationship:
Thus, the correct answer is: Both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).
This understanding is crucial for exams as it tests the ability to discern between causation and correlation, as well as understanding concepts related to measurement instruments.
Both the assertion and reason are correct. The presence of a positive zero error means the Vernier scale is shifted, causing an overestimation of measurements. The reason accurately describes a possible cause for such errors.
The Correct answer is: Both (A) and (R) are correct but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
| LIST-I | LIST-II | ||
| A. | Boltzmann constant | I. | \( \text{ML}^2\text{T}^{-1} \) |
| B. | Coefficient of viscosity | II. | \( \text{MLT}^{-3}\text{K}^{-1} \) |
| C. | Planck's constant | III. | \( \text{ML}^2\text{T}^{-2}\text{K}^{-1} \) |
| D. | Thermal conductivity | IV. | \( \text{ML}^{-1}\text{T}^{-1} \) |
Choose the correct answer from the options given below :


In the first configuration (1) as shown in the figure, four identical charges \( q_0 \) are kept at the corners A, B, C and D of square of side length \( a \). In the second configuration (2), the same charges are shifted to mid points C, E, H, and F of the square. If \( K = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \), the difference between the potential energies of configuration (2) and (1) is given by: