The Rebellion of 1857, also known as the First War of Indian Independence, was a major uprising against British rule. The British Government responded to the rebellion with extreme repressive measures to suppress the revolt and maintain control over India.
1. Martial Law and Military Action:
In the wake of the rebellion, the British government imposed Martial Law in many parts of India, particularly in areas like Delhi, Kanpur, and Lucknow. The British military took brutal action to suppress the rebels, including executing leaders, executing prisoners of war, and severely punishing entire communities that were seen as sympathetic to the rebels.
2. Public Executions and Mass Hangings:
One of the most infamous repressive measures was the widespread use of public executions. Rebels, including men, women, and children, were hanged, shot, or tied to cannons and blown apart. These executions were carried out to instill fear and deter others from joining the rebellion.
3. Widespread Destruction of Property:
The British systematically destroyed villages and towns suspected of supporting the rebellion. They looted properties, set villages on fire, and destroyed crops, creating economic hardship for the population. The destruction of property was intended to punish the rebels and prevent any further uprisings.
4. Mass Punishments and Reprisal Killings:
The British carried out mass reprisals, often punishing entire populations for the actions of a few rebels. In some cases, entire villages were massacred, and civilians were forced to pay heavy fines. These reprisals were part of the British effort to assert their dominance and eliminate any future resistance.
5. The Execution of Rebel Leaders:
Prominent leaders of the rebellion, such as Mangal Pandey, Rani Lakshmibai of Jhansi, and Bahadur Shah Zafar, were either executed or exiled. Bahadur Shah Zafar, the last Mughal emperor, was exiled to Rangoon (Myanmar) after being captured by the British.
6. Reorganization of the Indian Army:
The British also took significant steps to prevent any future military uprisings by reorganizing the Indian Army. They replaced Indian soldiers with British and loyal Indian soldiers, thus ensuring greater control over the military. The role of the British East India Company was reduced, and direct control of India was taken over by the British Crown in 1858.
Conclusion:
The repressive measures undertaken by the British Government in response to the Rebellion of 1857 were brutal and far-reaching. These measures were designed to break the will of the people and maintain British dominance in India. The legacy of these actions contributed to further resentment against British rule, eventually leading to India’s full independence in 1947.
What taluqdars thought
The attitude of the taluqdars was best expressed by Hanwant Singh, the Raja of Kalakankar, near Rae Bareli. During the mutiny, Hanwant Singh had given shelter to a British officer, and conveyed him to safety. While taking leave of the officer, Hanwant Singh told him:
Sahib, your countrymen came into this country and drove out our King. You sent your officers round the districts to examine the titles to the estates. At one blow you took from me lands which from time immemorial had been in my family. I submitted. Suddenly misfortune fell upon you. The people of the land rose against you. You came to me whom you had despoiled. I have saved you. But now – now I march at the head of my retainers to Lucknow to try and drive you from the country.
The Anguish of the King
When the king Devanampiya Piyadassi had been ruling for eight years, the (country of the) Kalingas (present-day coastal Orissa) was conquered by (him). One hundred and fifty thousand men were deported, a hundred thousand were killed, and many more died.
After that, now that (the country of) the Kalingas has been taken, Devanampiya (is devoted) to an intense study of Dhamma, to the love of Dhamma, and to instructing (the people) in Dhamma.
This is the repentance of Devanampiya on account of his conquest of the (country of the) Kalingas.
For this is considered very painful and deplorable by Devanampiya that, while one is conquering an unconquered (country) slaughter, death and deportation of people (take place) there...
Declining a Royal Gift
This excerpt from a sufi text describes the proceedings at Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya’s hospice in 1313 : I (the author, Amir Hasan Sijzi) had the good fortune of kissing his (Shaikh Nizamuddin Auliya’s) feet ... At this time a local ruler had sent him the deed of ownership to two gardens and much land, along with the provisions and tools for their maintenance. The ruler had also made it clear that he was relinquishing all his rights to both the gardens and land. The master ... had not accepted that gift. Instead, he had lamented: “What have I to do with gardens and fields and lands ? ... None of our ... spiritual masters had engaged in such activity.”
Then he told an appropriate story: “... Sultan Ghiyasuddin, who at that time was still known as Ulugh Khan, came to visit Shaikh Fariduddin (and) offered some money and ownership deeds for four villages to the Shaikh, the money being for the benefit of the dervishes (sufis), and the land for his use. Smiling, Shaikh al Islam (Fariduddin) said: ‘Give me the money. I will dispense it to the dervishes. But as for those land deeds, keep them. There are many who long for them. Give them away to such persons.’”