Question:

During her lecture, the speaker tried to clarify directional terms, for not everyone in attendance was knowledgeable that winds are designated by the direction from which they come.

Show Hint

Be cautious of subtle meaning shifts — “not everyone” means some lacked knowledge, while “everyone…not” means none knew at all.
Updated On: Aug 14, 2025
  • For everyone in attendance did not know.
  • For not everyone attending knew.
  • With everyone attending not knowledgeable.
  • With everyone in attendance not knowing.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

The purpose of the underlined part is to explain the reason why the speaker needed to clarify directional terms.
Option (b) “For not everyone attending knew” is concise, grammatically correct, and clearly conveys the reason — that some attendees did not have the required knowledge.
Option (a) “For everyone in attendance did not know” implies that nobody knew, which changes the meaning from partial ignorance to complete ignorance, contradicting the intended sense.
Option (c) “With everyone attending not knowledgeable” is awkwardly phrased and uses “not knowledgeable” in a clumsy way, lacking the natural flow of spoken or written English.
Option (d) “With everyone in attendance not knowing” also suggests complete ignorance and lacks the precision of indicating that it was “not everyone,” i.e., some but not all, who lacked the knowledge.
Therefore, option (b) is best because it keeps the intended meaning (only some lacked the knowledge), is grammatically sound, and fits smoothly into the sentence’s context.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions