Thank goodness, the damage to the car was \(\underline{neglectful.}\)
Thank goodness, the damage to the car was \(\underline{neglectful.}\)
Show Hint
- was negligible
- was neglectable
- was negligent
- was neglecting
The Correct Option is A
Solution and Explanation
This question tests the difference between commonly confused words (confusables) derived from the same root ("neglect"). The context requires a word that describes the extent of the damage.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
neglectful: This is an adjective used to describe a person or their behavior, meaning they fail to give proper care or attention to someone or something. (e.g., "The owner was neglectful of the pet.") It cannot describe an inanimate object like damage.
negligible: This adjective means so small, unimportant, or insignificant that it is not worth considering. This word correctly describes damage that is very minor.
neglectable: This is not a standard English word. The correct form is "negligible".
negligent: This adjective describes a person or action that shows a failure to take proper care, often leading to harm. (e.g., "The negligent driver caused the accident.") It describes the cause, not the effect.
neglecting: This is a verb form and does not fit grammatically.
The appropriate word to describe the amount of damage is "negligible."
Step 3: Final Answer:
Thank goodness, the damage to the car was negligible.
Top Questions on Sentence Correction
When I had to leave town due to office work, I had my brother to give food to my dog twice a day.
- IPMAT - 2025
- Verbal and Logical Ability
- Sentence Correction
Among scientists, the discovery of the double helix structure of DNA and the genetic code it incorporates is widely regarded to be one of the most significant scientific discovery of the twentieth century.
- IPMAT - 2025
- Verbal and Logical Ability
- Sentence Correction
Although the new policy aims to increase efficiency, reducing costs, and enhancing employee satisfaction, some employees feel that the changes are too abrupt and poorly communicated.
- IPMAT - 2025
- Verbal and Logical Ability
- Sentence Correction
If the President knew that his allies would let him down so suddenly, he would have handled them with the greatest care.
- IPMAT - 2025
- Verbal and Logical Ability
- Sentence Correction
- Correct any one of the following sentences:
(i) India won the match by an inning.- UP Board XII - 2025
- English
- Sentence Correction
Questions Asked in IPMAT exam
- Five teams—A, B, C, D, and E—each consisting of 15 members, are going on expeditions to five different locations. Each team includes members from three different skill sets: biologists, geologists, and explorers. However, the number of members from each skill set varies by team and each member has only one speciality. The total number of biologists, geologists, and explorers are equal. The following additional information is available
• Every team has at least 2 members from each of the three skill sets.
• Teams C and D have 6 biologists each, and Team A has 6 geologists.
• Every team except A has more biologists than explorers.
• The number of explorers in each team is distinct and decreases in the order A, B, C, D, and E.- IPMAT - 2025
- Logical Reasoning
- The set of all values of x satisfying the inequality \( \log_{(x+\frac{1}{2})} \left[ \log_2 \left( \frac{x-1}{x+2} \right) \right]>0 \) is
- IPMAT - 2025
- Number System
The table given below provides the details of monthly sales (in lakhs of rupees) and the value of products returned by the customers (as a percentage of sales) of an e-commerce company for three product categories for the year 2024. Net sales (in lakhs of rupees) is defined as the difference between sales (in lakhs of rupees) and the value of products returned (in lakhs of rupees).
- IPMAT - 2025
- Data Interpretation
Meta is recalibrating content on its social media platforms as the political tide has turned in Washington, with Mark Zuckerberg announcing last week that his company plans to fire its US fact-checkers. Fact-checking evolved in response to allegations of misinformation and is being watered down in response to accusations of censorship. Social media does not have solutions to either. Community review — introduced by Elon Musk at X and planned by Zuckerberg for Facebook and Instagram — is not a significant improvement over fact-checking. Having Washington lean on foreign governments over content moderation does not benefit free speech. Yet, that is the nature of the social media beast, designed to amplify bias.
Information and misinformation continue to jostle on social media at the mercy of user discretion. Social media now has enough control over all other forms of media to broaden its reach. It is the connective tissue for mass consumption of entertainment, and alternative platforms are reworking their engagement with social media. Technologies are shaping up to drive this advantage further through synthetic content targeted precisely at its intended audience. Meta’s algorithm will now play up politics because it is the flavour of the season.
The Achilles’ Heel of social media is informed choice which could turn against misinformation. Its move away from content moderation is driven by the need to be more inclusive, yet unfiltered content can push users away from social media towards legacy forms that have better moderation systems in place. Lawmakers across the world are unlikely to give social media a free run, even if Donald Trump is working on their case. Protections have already been put in place across jurisdictions over misinformation. These may be difficult to dismantle, even if the Republicans pull US-owned social media companies further to the right.
Media consumption is, in essence, evidence-based judgement that mediums must adapt to. Content moderation, not free speech, is the adaptation mechanism. Musk and Zuckerberg are not exempt- IPMAT - 2025
- Reading Comprehension
According to the French philosopher Jean Baudrillard, commodities available for consumption are not inherently negative things. Baudrillard tried to interpret consumption in modern societies by engaging with the ’cargo myth’ prevalent among the indigenous Melanesian people living in the South Pacific. The Melanesians did not know what aeroplanes were. However,they saw that these winged entities descended from the air for white people and appeared to make them happy. They also noted that aeroplanes never descended for the Melanesian people. The Melanesian natives noted that the white people had placed objects similar to the aeroplane on the ground. They concluded that these objects were attracting the aeroplanes in the air and bringing them to the ground. Through a magical process, the aeroplanes were bringing plenty to the white people and making them happy. The Melanesian people concluded that they would need to place objects that simulated the aeroplane on the ground and attract them from the air. Baudrillard believes that the cargo myth holds an important analogy for the ways in which consumers engage with objects of consumption.
According to Baudrillard, the modern consumer ”sets in place a whole array of sham objects, of characteristic signs of happiness, and then waits for happiness to alight”. For instance, modern consumers believe that they will get happiness if they buy the latest available version of a mobile phone or automobile. However, consumption does not usually lead to happiness. While consumers should ideally be blaming their heightened expectations for their lack of happiness, they blame the commodity instead.
They feel that they should have waited for the next version of a mobile phone or automobile before buying the one they did. The version they bought is somehow inferior and therefore cannot make them happy. Baudrillard argues that consumers have replaced ’real’ happiness with ’signs’ of happiness. This results in the endless deferment of the arrival of total happiness. In Baudrillard’s words, ”in everyday practice, the blessings of consumption are not experienced as resulting from work or from a production process; they are experienced as a miracle”. Modern consumers view consumption in the same magical way as the Melanesian people viewed the aeroplanes in the cargo myth. Television commercials also present objects of consumption as miracles. As a result, commodities appear to be distanced from the social processes which lead to their production. In effect, objects of consumption are divorced from the reality which produces them.- IPMAT - 2025
- Reading Comprehension