By triumph the author means-
- sin
- loss
- sorrow
- victory
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
In the provided passage by D. H. Lawrence, the concept of "triumph" is described in the context of being vividly and perfectly alive. Lawrence emphasizes the beauty and marvel of life, celebrating the here and now of living in the flesh. The passage highlights the ideas of being part of the cosmos, nature, and human existence, urging one to live with rapture and joy. In this context, "triumph" relates not to sin, loss, or sorrow, but to the highest form of existence and joy. It conveys a sense of achievement and glory associated with being vibrantly alive.
Therefore, in the context of the passage, the author equates "triumph" with victory over the lifelessness and insignificance of death, celebrating the victorious experience of life itself.
When the dead look after the afterwards the living should look at life
- forever
- for some months
- for only a short while
- in the past
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
By rapture the author means an emotion involving great
- trepidation
- thrill
- fear
- joy
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
To determine what the author means by "rapture," we need to examine the provided excerpt from D. H. Lawrence and the associated options.
In the passage, Lawrence writes about the marvel of being alive and the magnificent experience of life in the flesh. He emphasizes this vivid and perfect state of being alive, suggesting it is something to be celebrated.
When he says, "We ought to dance with rapture, that we should be alive and in the flesh, and part of the living, incarnate cosmos," he's expressing a profound appreciation and delight for existence itself.
This aligns most appropriately with the emotion of "joy". Therefore, the correct answer is: joy.
By the last line “It .................. waters”, the author means that the mind is only
- a mirage
- an illusion
- magic
- a reflection
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
- a mirage
- an illusion
- magic
- a reflection
The tone of this passage is
- social
- moral
- reflective
- philosophical
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
To determine the tone of the passage from D. H. Lawrence's "Apocalypse," we should focus on the language and themes presented in the text.
The passage reflects on the marvel of life, emphasizing the connection between humans and nature. Phrases like "the vast marvel is to be alive" and "the supreme triumph is to be most vividly, most perfectly alive" suggest a deep contemplation of existence. The passage explores connections between humans, nature, and the universe, using metaphoric language to express these ideas: "I am part of the sun as my eye is the part of me" and "my blood is part of the sea."
This depth of reflection on the interconnectedness and experiences of life aligns with a philosophical tone. The author discusses abstract concepts concerning life and existence, characteristic of philosophical writing.
Therefore, the tone of the passage is philosophical.
The most suitable title for this passage would be -
- The Surface of the Waters
- My Mind
- The Human Race
- Alive and Kicking
The Correct Option is D
Solution and Explanation
The passage by D.H. Lawrence emphasizes the profound experience and value of being alive. The narrative celebrates life in the flesh, suggesting that being part of the living cosmos is a supreme triumph. Lawrence speaks of the interconnectedness of humans with nature and the universe, highlighting the relationship between the individual and the larger entities like the soul, family, and human race. The passage also reflects on the fleeting nature of life and the transient yet vibrant existence of beings.
The most suitable title for this passage is "Alive and Kicking." This title encapsulates the essence of Lawrence's message, which is to cherish the vibrancy and miraculous sensation of being alive. It underscores the theme that life should be celebrated with joy and awareness, aligning well with the passage's emphasis on living fully and vividly.
Top Questions on Reading Comprehension
- Shown below are letters ‘e’ taken from four popular logos, arranged in a sequence. Which of the options is the correct sequence?
- UCEED - 2026
- English Language Comprehension
- Reading Comprehension
- Shown below are four options, each showing consecutive frames representing the movement of a pendulum of an old-style wall clock for an animation movie. Which is the correct option?
- UCEED - 2026
- English Language Comprehension
- Reading Comprehension
- Acrucial moderating factor in how people experience comparisons is self-esteem. Individuals with high self-esteem are more likely to interpret upward comparison as informative rather than threatening. They are more resilient in the face of others’ success and more likely to believe they can reach their own goals. In contrast, people with low self-esteem are more prone to interpret comparison as judgment, reinforcing negative self-views and triggering feelings of inadequacy.
This dynamic creates a self-reinforcing loop. People with high self-esteem are less vulnerable to upward comparison, which intensifies those doubts. Those with a secure sense of self are more likely to use comparison as a learning tool. The same external stimulus—a colleague’s achievements, a friend’s popularity—can have radically different effects depending on internal stability.
Self-esteem also influences how people choose their comparison targets. Research has found that individuals often engage in “selective comparison,” seeking out those who confirm their existing beliefs about themselves. This can become a subtle form of self-sabotage. Someone who feels unworthy may subconsciously seek out targets that reinforce that sense, perpetuating a narrative of inferiority. One of the most promising antidotes to social comparison is temporal comparison—evaluating oneself not against others, but against one’s own past. This method has been shown to increase motivation and satisfaction, especially when individuals can see concrete progress. Temporal comparison activates the same reward circuits as social comparison but avoids the threat systems associated with social ranking. It also reinforces agency: individuals focus on what they can control and improve rather than what others control. In therapeutic and coaching settings, temporal comparison is used to help clients build self-efficacy and track growth over time.
Moreover, people who focus on self-improvement rather than social dominance are less likely to fall into cycles of envy or self-pity. They can still use others as inspiration, but they do so without attaching their self-worth to the outcome. This is not to say they never compare—but that they focus on learning, rather than judgment. The most skilful approach to comparison may lie in eliminating it, but in reframing it as feedback. When we interpret comparison as information rather than a verdict, we can ask, “What can I learn from this?” This shift turns comparison into a growth tool. Teachers mentor their students, not as rivals. Psychologists emphasize that the key variable here is mindset.
A fixed mindset sees comparison as a threat. If someone else is better, it means we are worse. A growth mindset sees comparison as a map. If someone else has reached a certain level, it means the path exists. This reframing is not just a cognitive trick. It changes the emotional tone of comparison, making it more likely to inspire than to wound. Reframing also requires emotional regulation—the ability to notice an initial pang of envy or shame without reacting impulsively. With practice, individuals can learn to pause, reflect, and reinterpret their emotional responses. Over time, this builds resilience and self-trust, allowing comparison to become a learning tool rather than a cage.- XAT - 2026
- Verbal and Logical Ability
- Reading Comprehension
When people who are talking don’t share the same culture, knowledge, values, and assumptions, mutual understanding can be especially difficult. Such understanding is possible through the negotiation of meaning. To negotiate meaning with someone, you have to become aware of and respect both the differences in your backgrounds and when these differences are important. You need enough diversity of cultural and personal experience to be aware that divergent world views exist and what they might be like. You also need the flexibility in world view, and a generous tolerance for mistakes, as well as a talent for finding the right metaphor to communicate the relevant parts of unshared experiences or to highlight the shared experiences while demphasizing the others. Metaphorical imagination is a crucial skill in creating rapport and in communicating the nature of unshared experience. This skill consists, in large measure, of the ability to bend your world view and adjust the way you categorize your experiences. Problems of mutual understanding are not exotic; they arise in all extended conversations where understanding is important.
When it really counts, meaning is almost never communicated according to the CONDUIT metaphor, that is, where one person transmits a fixed, clear proposition to another by means of expressions in a common language, where both parties have all the relevant common knowledge, assumptions, values, etc. When the chips are down, meaning is negotiated: you slowly figure out what you have in common, what it is safe to talk about, how you can communicate unshared experience or create a shared vision. With enough flexibility in bending your world view and with luck and charity, you may achieve some mutual understanding.
Communication theories based on the CONDUIT metaphor turn from the pathetic to the evil when they are applied indiscriminately on a large scale, say, in government surveillance or computerized files. There, what is most crucial for real understanding is almost never included, and it is assumed that the words in the file have meaning in themselves—disembodied, objective, understandable meaning. When a society lives by the CONDUITmetaphor on a large scale, misunderstanding, persecution, and much worse are the likely products.- XAT - 2026
- Verbal and Logical Ability
- Reading Comprehension
Later, I realized that reviewing the history of nuclear physics served another purpose as well: It gave the lie to the naive belief that the physicists could have come together when nuclear fission was discovered (in Nazi Germany!) and agreed to keep the discovery a secret, thereby sparing humanity such a burden. No. Given the development of nuclear physics up to 1938, development that physicists throughout the world pursued in all innocence of any intention of finding the engine of a new weapon of mass destruction—only one of them, the remarkable Hungarian physicist Leo Szilard, took that possibility seriously—the discovery of nuclear fission was inevitable. To stop it, you would have had to stop physics. If German scientists hadn’t made the discovery when they did, French, American, Russian, Italian, or Danish scientists would have done so, almost certainly within days or weeks. They were all working at the same cutting edge, trying to understand the strange results of a simple experiment bombarding uranium with neutrons. Here was no Faustian bargain, as movie directors and other naifs still find it intellectually challenging to imagine. Here was no evil machinery that the noble scientists might hide from the problems and the generals. To the contrary, there was a high insight into how the world works, an energetic reaction, older than the earth, that science had finally devised the instruments and arrangements to coart forth. “Make it seem inevitable,” Louis Pasteur used to advise his students when they prepared to write up their discoveries. But it was. To wish that it might have been ignored or suppressed is barbarous. “Knowledge,” Niels Bohr once noted, “is itself the basis for civilization.” You cannot have the one without the other; the one depends upon the other. Nor can you have only benevolent knowledge; the scientific method doesn’t filter for benevolence. Knowledge has consequences, not always intended, not always comfortable, but always welcome. The earth revolves around the sun, not the sun around the earth. “It is a profound and necessary truth,” Robert Oppenheimer would say, “that the deep things in science are not found because they are useful; they are found because it was possible to find them.”
...Bohr proposed once that the goal of science is not universal truth. Rather, he argued, the modest but relentless goal of science is “the gradual removal of prejudices.” The discovery that the earth revolves around the sun has gradually removed the prejudice that the earth is the center of the universe. The discovery of microbes is gradually removing the prejudice that disease is a punishment from God. The discovery of evolution is gradually removing the prejudice that Homo sapiens is a separate and special creation.- XAT - 2026
- Verbal and Logical Ability
- Reading Comprehension
Questions Asked in SNAP exam
- Find the unit digit of 1! + 2! + .... + 100!
- SNAP - 2025
- Number Systems
- If there are two red and blue dice. Find the probability when the sum of the dice is a prime number, where the number on red is more than blue.
- SNAP - 2025
- Probability
- A solid metallic cylinder of radius \( 6 \, \text{cm} \) and height \( 20 \, \text{cm} \) is melted and recast into a large sphere. What is the radius of the sphere?
- SNAP - 2025
- Mensuration
- A shopkeeper marks up his goods by 40% and offers a discount of 10%. What is his final profit percentage?
- SNAP - 2025
- Profit and Loss
- The political opinion piece in the newspaper was a __________ critique of the government's foreign policy, aiming to __________ a strong public reaction.
- SNAP - 2025
- Fill in the Blanks