\([Cr(NH_3)_6]^{3+}\) is paramagnetic while \([Ni(CN)_4]^{2-}\) is diamagnetic. Explain why?
\(Cr \) is in the \(+3\) oxidation state i.e., \(d^{3}\) configuration. Also, \(NH_3\) is a weak field ligand that does not cause the pairing of the electrons in the \(3d\) orbital.
\(Cr^{3+}\)
Therefore, it undergoes \(d^{2}\) \(sp^{3}\) hybridization and the electrons in the \(3d\) orbitals remain unpaired.
Hence, it is paramagnetic in nature.
In \([Ni(CN)_4] ^{2-}\) , Ni exists in the \(+2\) oxidation state i.e., \(d^{8}\) configuration.
\(Ni^{2+}\):
\(CN^{-}\) is a strong field ligand. It causes the pairing of the \(3d\) orbital electrons.
Then, \(Ni^{2+}\) undergoes \(dsp^{2} \)hybridization.
As there are no unpaired electrons, it is diamagnetic
The Crystal Field Theory (CFT) of coordination compounds is based on the effect of different crystal fields (provided by the ligands taken as point charges) on the degeneracy of d-orbital energies of the central metal atom/ion. The splitting of the d-orbitals provides different electronic arrangements in strong and weak crystal fields. In tetrahedral coordination entity formation, the d-orbital splitting is smaller as compared to the octahedral entity.
What is crystal field splitting energy?
The Crystal Field Theory (CFT) of coordination compounds is based on the effect of different crystal fields (provided by the ligands taken as point charges) on the degeneracy of d-orbital energies of the central metal atom/ion. The splitting of the d-orbitals provides different electronic arrangements in strong and weak crystal fields. In tetrahedral coordination entity formation, the d-orbital splitting is smaller as compared to the octahedral entity.
On the basis of CFT, explain why [Ti(H$_2$O)$_6$]Cl$_3$ complex is coloured? What happens on heating the complex [Ti(H$_2$O)$_6$]Cl$_3$? Give reason.