Question:

Assertion (A): X, because of unsound state of mind and not knowing the nature of the act, attacks Y, who in self-defense and in order to ward off the attack, hits him thereby injuring him. Y has not committed an offence.
Reason (R): Y had a right of private defense against X under Section 98 of the Indian Penal Code.

Show Hint

The right of private defense can be exercised even against acts of minors or persons of unsound mind.
Updated On: Aug 11, 2025
  • Both A and R are individually true and R is the correct explanation of A
  • Both A and R are individually true but R is not the correct explanation of A
  • A is true but R is false
  • A is false but R is true
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Section 98 IPC allows the right of private defense against acts of a person of unsound mind if such acts would have constituted an offence had they been committed by a person of sound mind. Here, Y’s act was in lawful self-defense and thus not an offence. Both A and R are true, and R correctly explains A.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

View More Questions