Assertion (A): The boiling points of alkyl halides decrease in the order: RI>RBr>RCl>RF. Reason (R): The boiling points of alkyl chlorides, bromides and iodides are considerably higher than that of the hydrocarbon of comparable molecular mass.
Assertion (A) is false, but Reason (R) is true.
Step 1: Understanding the boiling point order. The boiling points of alkyl halides decrease in the order: RI>RBr>RCl>RF because the iodine atom is the largest halogen, leading to stronger dispersion forces and, consequently, higher boiling points.
Step 2: Reason for the boiling point order. While Reason (R) is true in stating that alkyl halides have higher boiling points compared to hydrocarbons of comparable molecular mass, it does not directly explain the order in which boiling points decrease. The reason for this specific order lies more in the halogen size and the resultant intermolecular forces.
Step 3: Conclusion. Thus, both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of Assertion (A). The correct answer is option (B). \vspace{10pt}
Arrange the following compounds in increasing order of their boiling points: \includegraphics[]{6a.png}
\includegraphics[]{6b.png}
\includegraphics[]{6c.png}
(a) Arrange the following compounds in increasing order of their boiling point: \[ \text{(CH}_3\text{)}_2\text{NH, CH}_3\text{CH}_2\text{NH}_2, \text{CH}_3\text{CH}_2\text{OH} \]
A school is organizing a debate competition with participants as speakers and judges. $ S = \{S_1, S_2, S_3, S_4\} $ where $ S = \{S_1, S_2, S_3, S_4\} $ represents the set of speakers. The judges are represented by the set: $ J = \{J_1, J_2, J_3\} $ where $ J = \{J_1, J_2, J_3\} $ represents the set of judges. Each speaker can be assigned only one judge. Let $ R $ be a relation from set $ S $ to $ J $ defined as: $ R = \{(x, y) : \text{speaker } x \text{ is judged by judge } y, x \in S, y \in J\} $.