\( [CoF_6]^{3-} \)
The magnetic moment of a metal complex depends on the number of unpaired electrons in the d-orbitals of the central metal ion. The formula for magnetic moment \( \mu_{\text{eff}} \) is given by: \[ \mu_{\text{eff}} = \sqrt{n(n+2)} \] Where \( n \) is the number of unpaired electrons. The more unpaired electrons there are, the higher the magnetic moment. Let’s analyze the complexes:
- (1) \( [NiCl_4]^{2-} \): For Ni²⁺, which has an electronic configuration of \( 3d^8 \), in the presence of chloride ions (Cl⁻), a weak field ligand, it results in two unpaired electrons. The magnetic moment will be moderate.
- (2) \( [Mn(CN)_6]^{4-} \): \( \text{Mn}^{2+} \) has an electronic configuration of \( 3d^5 \), and \( \text{CN}^- \) is a strong field ligand, so it causes pairing of the electrons. In this complex, no unpaired electrons are present, making the magnetic moment zero (since \( [Mn(CN)_6]^{4-} \) is diamagnetic).
- (3) \( [Cr(NH_3)_6]^{3+} \): Cr³⁺ has an electronic configuration of \( 3d^3 \), and ammonia (NH₃) is a weak field ligand, so there will be three unpaired electrons, making this complex paramagnetic with a relatively high magnetic moment.
- (4) \( [CoF_6]^{3-} \): Co³⁺ has an electronic configuration of \( 3d^6 \), and fluoride ions (F⁻) are weak field ligands. This results in four unpaired electrons, so the complex will have a high magnetic moment.
Thus, the highest magnetic moment will be found in \( [CoF_6]^{3-} \) and \( [Cr(NH_3)_6]^{3+} \), with Cr³⁺ having a relatively higher number of unpaired electrons compared to the other complexes. The correct answer is Option (2).
Werner’s coordination theory in 1893 was the first attempt to explain the bonding in coordination complexes. It must be remembered that this theory was put forward before the electron had been discovered by J.J. Thomson in 1897, and before the electronic theory of valency. Werner did not have any of the modern instrumental techniques and all his studies were made using simple experimental techniques. Werner was able to explain the nature of bonding in complexes and he concluded that in complexes, the metal shows two different sorts of valency: primary and secondary. Primary valences are normally ionisable whereas secondary valences are non-ionisable.
The following data shows the number of students in different streams in a school:
Which type of graph is best suited to represent this data?
What comes next in the series?
\(2, 6, 12, 20, 30, \ ?\)