Comprehension

Analyse the following caselet and answer the questions that follow:
The City of Yashmund is served by licensed taxis operating on o cially sanctioned metered rates and driven by licensed drivers who do not own the taxis but pay a monthly rent to the taxi-owners. Shailesh Nair, the mayor of Yashmund, perceived that most of these taxis do not offer su cient comfort and safety to passengers 

Question: 1

The Mayor wants the owners and drivers to care about comfort. Which of the following decisions, IF TAKEN, is MOST LIKELY to increase the comfort levels of passengers?

Show Hint

In decision-making questions, prioritize the option that creates a \textbf{direct accountability mechanism} or \textbf{aligns incentives} with the stated goal. Here, passenger feedback tied to license renewal ensures long-term improvements.
Updated On: Aug 25, 2025
  • The mayor issues a guideline that taxis will be randomly inspected by the police for the comfort level.
  • The mayor ensures banks grant drivers loans to own cars. Owner-driven cars generally offer greater comfort.
  • The mayor introduces licensing of air-conditioned taxis which can charge increased rates to the rich customers.
  • The mayor introduces a feedback system that records passenger satisfaction with comfort levels; this will affect renewal of annual taxi license.
  • The mayor permits doubling metered rates which will ensure enhanced income for owners to invest in greater comfort.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Clarify the goal.
The Mayor wants owners and drivers to actively care about passenger comfort. The best policy would be one that directly links passenger comfort with drivers’/owners’ incentives or consequences.
Step 2: Assess the options.
- (A) Random police inspections — While inspections may check compliance, they are irregular, external, and may not directly reflect real passenger experiences. Limited effectiveness.
- (B) Bank loans for car ownership — Ownership may indirectly improve maintenance and comfort, but it does not guarantee that drivers will prioritize passenger comfort.
- (C) Licensing air-conditioned taxis — Helps a certain group (wealthier passengers) but does not ensure overall improvement in comfort standards across all taxis.
- (D) Feedback system linked to license renewal — Strongest mechanism. It directly ties passenger comfort ratings to the drivers’/owners’ ability to continue operating. This creates a continuous incentive to improve comfort for all passengers.
- (E) Doubling metered rates — Provides more income to owners but does not guarantee that money will be reinvested in passenger comfort.
Step 3: Conclude.
The most effective and reliable policy is (D), since it creates accountability by linking service quality with the license to operate.
\[ \boxed{\text{Correct Answer: (D)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0
Question: 2

The mayor wants to involve the car owners in finding a solution to the problem of comfort and safety. He is concerned that the customers may not be willing to pay more for safety. Which of the options below is MOST LIKELY to convince the owners?

Show Hint

When judging persuasion policies, prefer options that align \textbf{direct financial incentives} with \textbf{credible enforcement}. A clear, authorized price premium \(\Rightarrow\) higher owner buy-in; meaningful penalties \(\Rightarrow\) sustained compliance.
Updated On: Aug 25, 2025
  • The taxi owners who clear comfort-inspection can charge higher rentals from the drivers and drivers with impeccable safety record can charge the same from customers
  • The taxis that clear comfort-inspection can charge 25% above the metered rates; studies have shown that customers are willing to pay around 18% extra for comfort.
  • If a taxis owner has a consistent record of comfort and safety the government will subsidize a second loan.
  • Taxis can charge 25% more if they clear comfort-inspection. However, owners of the taxis found compromising on safety will be jailed.
  • Taxis that pass comfort-inspection test can charge 25% more. Should they violate any traffic rule this privilege would be withdrawn.
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Identify what will persuade owners given the mayor’s concern.
Owners need a clear monetary upside for meeting comfort/safety standards {and} a strong deterrent for shirking. The mayor also worries customers may resist paying more, so a policy signal that {authorizes} a surcharge helps legitimize higher fares.
Step 2: Evaluate the options.
(A) Indirect, two-level passing of cost (owner $\Rightarrow$ driver $\Rightarrow$ customer). No firm enforcement or customer-facing authorization; weak incentive.
(B) Authorizes a 25% premium but cites evidence of only \(\sim\)18% willingness; the mismatch undermines feasibility and thus owner confidence.
(C) Offers a subsidy (carrot) but says nothing about prices or customer willingness; also delayed/conditional—less persuasive than direct revenue.
(D) Provides a carrot (25% authorized premium) {and} a stick (jail for compromising safety). The authorization helps overcome the “customers won’t pay” worry by making the surcharge official, while the penalty ensures compliance. Most compelling to owners.
(E) Carrot with revocation on {any} traffic rule—overbroad and easier to lose; deterrent is weaker than (D)’s legal penalty, so less convincing.
Step 3: Conclude.
Option (D) best aligns incentives and enforcement to convince owners despite the concern about customers paying more.
\[ \boxed{\text{Correct Answer: (D)}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Top Questions on Caselets

View More Questions