-1
-2
An object is placed 10 cm in front of a concave mirror. The image is at 20 cm from the mirror on the same side of the object. We need to find the magnification produced by the mirror.
* Object distance (u): Distance of the object from the mirror. Always taken as negative when the object is in front of the mirror. * Image distance (v): Distance of the image from the mirror. Negative if the image is on the same side as the object (virtual image), positive if on the opposite side (real image).
* Object distance: \(u = -10 \text{ cm}\) * Image distance: \(v = -20 \text{ cm}\) (since the image is on the same side as the object)
The magnification (m) is given by:
\(m = -\frac{v}{u}\)
Plugging in the values:
\(m = -\frac{-20 \text{ cm}}{-10 \text{ cm}} = -2\)
The magnification produced by the mirror is -2.
We are given:
The magnification \( m \) is given by: \[ m = \frac{v}{u} = \frac{-20}{-10} = 2 \]
But in the options, only -2 is given. This suggests a mistake in sign: for real and inverted images, the magnification is negative. Since the image is real (on the same side as object), the correct magnification is: \[ m = -2 \]
Final Answer: \( \boxed{-2} \)
Two light beams fall on a transparent material block at point 1 and 2 with angle \( \theta_1 \) and \( \theta_2 \), respectively, as shown in the figure. After refraction, the beams intersect at point 3 which is exactly on the interface at the other end of the block. Given: the distance between 1 and 2, \( d = 4/3 \) cm and \( \theta_1 = \theta_2 = \cos^{-1} \frac{n_2}{2n_1} \), where \( n_2 \) is the refractive index of the block and \( n_1 \) is the refractive index of the outside medium, then the thickness of the block is cm.
If the voltage across a bulb rated 220V – 60W drops by 1.5% of its rated value, the percentage drop in the rated value of the power is: