To determine which sentence does not fit well in the paragraph, let's analyze the theme and flow of the sentences:
- Sentence 1: Introduces the idea that companies are shifting focus from hard skills to other considerations in hiring.
- Sentence 3: Supports this shift by explaining that soft skills like leadership and teamwork are now often included in job descriptions.
- Sentence 4: Provides a balanced view, stating that technical expertise is still necessary in some jobs, reinforcing the shift without discounting hard skills entirely.
- Sentence 5: Offers a reason for this shift — the impact of the pandemic — thus anchoring the change in a real-world context.
- Sentence 2: Talks about abandoning the idea of an "ideal candidate," which is not directly tied to the contrast between hard and soft skills like the others.
Conclusion: Sentences 1, 3, 4, and 5 form a cohesive narrative centered around the growing importance of soft skills in hiring practices. Sentence 2, while related to recruitment, diverges from the central theme and disrupts the logical flow.
Answer: Sentence 2 is the odd one out.