To determine the induced EMF in the loop at \(t = 10 \text{ s}\), we can analyze the situation using the concept of electromagnetic induction. According to Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, the EMF induced in a closed loop is equal to the negative rate of change of magnetic flux through the loop.
The formula for induced EMF \((\varepsilon)\) is given by:
\(\varepsilon = -\frac{{d\Phi}}{{dt}}\)
where \(\Phi\) is the magnetic flux.
Magnetic flux \((\Phi)\) through a coil is given by:
\(\Phi = B \times A\)
where \(B\) is the magnetic field strength and \(A\) is the area of the coil inside the magnetic field.
Initially, let's consider the position of the square loop:
At \(t = 0\), the front edge of the loop just starts to enter the magnetic field.
At \(t = 10 \text{ s}\), the distance covered by the loop is:
\(d = \text{velocity} \times \text{time} = 2 \, \text{cm/s} \times 10 \, \text{s} = 20 \, \text{cm}\)
Since the loop has moved 20 cm and the side of the loop is 15 cm, the entire loop is now outside the magnetic field (since \(20 \, \text{cm} > 15 \, \text{cm} + 50 \, \text{cm}\)).
Therefore, since the loop is completely outside the magnetic field or has not yet fully entered it, the magnetic flux through the loop is zero.
Thus, the rate of change of magnetic flux \((\frac{d\Phi}{dt})\) is zero, and the induced EMF in the loop is:
\(\varepsilon = 0 \, \text{V}\)
Hence, the correct answer is zero EMF is induced in the loop.
At \( t = 10s \), the complete loop is already inside the magnetic field. Since the loop is entirely within the magnetic field, there is no change in the flux as the loop moves through the field. The rate of change of magnetic flux \( \frac{d\Phi}{dt} \) is zero because the area of the loop inside the magnetic field remains constant.
Thus, the induced emf is:
\( e = \frac{d\Phi}{dt} = 0. \)

In the first configuration (1) as shown in the figure, four identical charges \( q_0 \) are kept at the corners A, B, C and D of square of side length \( a \). In the second configuration (2), the same charges are shifted to mid points C, E, H, and F of the square. If \( K = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \), the difference between the potential energies of configuration (2) and (1) is given by:
A proton is moving undeflected in a region of crossed electric and magnetic fields at a constant speed of \( 2 \times 10^5 \, \text{m/s} \). When the electric field is switched off, the proton moves along a circular path of radius 2 cm. The magnitude of electric field is \( x \times 10^4 \, \text{N/C} \). The value of \( x \) is \(\_\_\_\_\_\). (Take the mass of the proton as \( 1.6 \times 10^{-27} \, \text{kg} \)).
Due to presence of an em-wave whose electric component is given by \( E = 100 \sin(\omega t - kx) \, NC^{-1} \), a cylinder of length 200 cm holds certain amount of em-energy inside it. If another cylinder of same length but half diameter than previous one holds same amount of em-energy, the magnitude of the electric field of the corresponding em-wave should be modified as:
Let \( C_{t-1} = 28, C_t = 56 \) and \( C_{t+1} = 70 \). Let \( A(4 \cos t, 4 \sin t), B(2 \sin t, -2 \cos t) \text{ and } C(3r - n_1, r^2 - n - 1) \) be the vertices of a triangle ABC, where \( t \) is a parameter. If \( (3x - 1)^2 + (3y)^2 = \alpha \) is the locus of the centroid of triangle ABC, then \( \alpha \) equals:
Designate whether each of the following compounds is aromatic or not aromatic.

The dimension of $ \sqrt{\frac{\mu_0}{\epsilon_0}} $ is equal to that of: (Where $ \mu_0 $ is the vacuum permeability and $ \epsilon_0 $ is the vacuum permittivity)