To solve the problem, we need to determine if either statement provides sufficient information to find the time the ship takes to reach the lighthouse.
Let's consider the given statements individually:
- Statement 1: Initially, the man standing on the lighthouse observes the ship at an angle of depression of 30°.
- From this statement, we know the initial angle of depression, which allows us to find the initial distance using the trigonometric identity:
\[\tan(30^\circ) = \frac{{\text{height of lighthouse}}}{\text{initial distance}}\]- Since the angle of depression changes to 45° after 8 minutes, we can use the new angle to find the distance at that point:
- Because we have an initial and a subsequent distance, we can find the time to reach the lighthouse using relative speed calculation. Therefore, statement 1 is sufficient.
- Statement 2: The speed of the ship was 6 km/h and the height of the lighthouse is 300 m.
- Given the speed of the ship and the height of the lighthouse, when the angle of depression is 45°, the horizontal distance equals the height of the lighthouse (same reasoning as with statement 1).
- Therefore, the time to cover this final distance at constant speed (6 km/h) can be calculated directly. This makes statement 2 sufficient by itself.
In conclusion, either statement (1) alone or statement (2) alone is sufficient to answer the question. Thus, the correct answer is:
either statement (1) alone or statement (2) alone is sufficient to answer the question