We use the formula for the total resistance \(R\) of the voltmeter:
\[ R = \frac{V}{I} - R_G \]
Where:
Substituting the values:
\[ R = \frac{100}{5 \times 10^{-3}} - 50 = 20000 - 50 = 19950 \, \Omega \]
Thus, the resistance required is \(19950 \, \Omega\), which corresponds to Option (3).
The problem requires us to find the value of a series resistance needed to convert a given galvanometer into a voltmeter that can measure up to 100 V.
To convert a galvanometer into a voltmeter, a high resistance, often called a multiplier resistor (\(R_s\)), is connected in series with the galvanometer. The purpose of this series resistor is to limit the current flowing through the galvanometer to its full-scale deflection current (\(I_g\)) when the maximum desired voltage (\(V\)) is applied across the combination.
According to Ohm's law, the total voltage \(V\) across the voltmeter (the series combination of the galvanometer and the resistor) is given by:
where:
\(V\) is the maximum voltage the voltmeter can measure.
\(I_g\) is the current for full-scale deflection of the galvanometer.
\(R_g\) is the internal resistance of the galvanometer.
\(R_s\) is the resistance of the series resistor.
Step 1: Identify and list the given parameters from the problem statement.
Resistance of the galvanometer, \(R_g = 50 \, \Omega\).
Maximum current (full-scale deflection current), \(I_g = 5 \, \text{mA} = 5 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{A}\).
The desired maximum voltage measurement range, \(V = 100 \, \text{V}\).
Step 2: State the formula for the series resistance \(R_s\). We rearrange the main formula \(V = I_g (R_g + R_s)\) to solve for \(R_s\).
\[ \frac{V}{I_g} = R_g + R_s \]Therefore, the required series resistance is:
\[ R_s = \frac{V}{I_g} - R_g \]Step 3: Substitute the given numerical values into the formula to calculate \(R_s\).
\[ R_s = \frac{100 \, \text{V}}{5 \times 10^{-3} \, \text{A}} - 50 \, \Omega \]Step 4: Perform the calculation to find the value of \(R_s\).
First, calculate the ratio \(\frac{V}{I_g}\):
\[ \frac{100}{5 \times 10^{-3}} = \frac{100 \times 1000}{5} = 20 \times 1000 = 20000 \, \Omega \]Now, subtract the galvanometer resistance from this value:
\[ R_s = 20000 \, \Omega - 50 \, \Omega \] \[ R_s = 19950 \, \Omega \]Hence, the resistance that must be connected in series to convert the galvanometer into a voltmeter that can measure up to 100 V is 19950 Ω.
Assertion (A): The deflection in a galvanometer is directly proportional to the current passing through it.
Reason (R): The coil of a galvanometer is suspended in a uniform radial magnetic field.
Galvanometer:
A galvanometer is an instrument used to show the direction and strength of the current passing through it. In a galvanometer, a coil placed in a magnetic field experiences a torque and hence gets deflected when a current passes through it.
The name "galvanometer" is derived from the surname of Italian scientist Luigi Galvani, who in 1791 discovered that electric current makes a dead frog’s leg jerk.
A spring attached to the coil provides a counter torque. In equilibrium, the deflecting torque is balanced by the restoring torque of the spring, and we have the relation:
\[ NBAI = k\phi \]
Where:
As the current \( I_g \) that produces full-scale deflection in the galvanometer is very small, the galvanometer alone cannot be used to measure current in electric circuits.
To convert a galvanometer into an ammeter (to measure larger currents), a small resistance called a shunt is connected in parallel to the galvanometer.
To convert it into a voltmeter (to measure potential difference), a high resistance is connected in series with the galvanometer.
For \( \alpha, \beta, \gamma \in \mathbb{R} \), if \[ \lim_{x \to 0} \frac{x^2 \sin(\alpha x) + (\gamma - 1)e^{x^2}}{\sin(2x - \beta x)} = 3, \] then \( \beta + \gamma - \alpha \) is equal to:

In the first configuration (1) as shown in the figure, four identical charges \( q_0 \) are kept at the corners A, B, C and D of square of side length \( a \). In the second configuration (2), the same charges are shifted to mid points C, E, H, and F of the square. If \( K = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \), the difference between the potential energies of configuration (2) and (1) is given by: