Read the following passage and answers the questions that follow:
OpenAI, a for-profit artificial intelligence lab in san Francisco, invited the public to converse with a new artificially intelligent chatbot, chat GPT, on Nov. 30, 2022. Within days, more than a million people had signed up to converse with the program Minds were blown.
Chat GPT is the first chatbot that's enjoyable enough to speak with and useful enough to ask for information. It can engage in philosophical discussions and help in practical matters false hype, the real thing is here. It's easier to use more intuitive, gives better answer - and it's arguably more fun and what really make it stand out from the pack is its gratifying ability to handle feedback about its answers, and revise them on the fly really is like a conversation with a Robot.
And along with its "fun part"- writing poems, telling jokes debeting politics, writing realistic TED Talk on ludicrous subjects - ChatGPT "will actually take stances, "Kantrowitz writes." When I mentioned Hitler built highways in Germany, it replied they were made with forced labor. This was impressive, nuanced pushback I hadn't previously seen from chatbots.
Where a question doesn't have a clear answer chatGPT often won't be pinned down, "which in itself is a notable development in computing. and unlike other chatbots chatGPT does a pretty good job of weeding out inappropriate" requests including question that are racist, sexist, homophobic transphobic or otherwise discriminatory or questions not to mention illegal.
ChatGPT has limitation. First of all the chatbot has "limited knowledge of world we events after 2021. Also, "ChatGPT sometime writes plausible- sound but incorrect or nonsensical "answer" and it is often excessively verbose and overuses certain phrases.
"We are not capable of understanding the context or meaning of the words we generate", ChatGPT told Time in an interview, because "we don't have access to the vast amount of knowledge that a human has. We can only provide information that we've been trained on, and we may not be able to answer questions that are outside of our training data."
We are just tools we should not be relied on for critical decisions or complex tasks.