List of top English Questions asked in CUET (PG)

HISTORY OF TUSSLE: After see-saw battle in various courts, final word from SC
New Delhi: It was a carefully worded notification issued by the Union ministry of home affairs (MHA) in May 2015 that led to Thursday's ruling of the Supreme Court on who holds the reins of power in Delhi. 
Faced with an ongoing tussle between the lieutenant governor and the newly elected Delhi Chief minister over the appointment of bureaucrats in 2015, the Central government responded with the notification making the LG effectively the person in charge of the capital and handed him full control of 'service', or the administrative prerogative to post or transfer civil servants in Delhi. 
Three key subjects-public order, police and land-were under the jurisdiction of the central government, while sectors such as health, education, agriculture, forest and transport fell under Delhi's elected government. Robbed of the authority it had shared with the LG since 1991, when an elected legislature was put in place for the capital, the AAP government approached Delhi High Court. 
After several hearings, in 2016 the high court came out with the first comprehensive ruling on the vexed constitutional status, but decided against the AAP government, concluding that LG was the de-facto boss of Delhi who wasn't bound by the aid and advice of the state cabinet.
The court upheld the MHA notification ad quashed those issued by the state government, ruling them illegal because they were issued without the LG's concurrence even when several of these were not related to police, public order or land, the explicit no-go areas. The court also upheld the barring of Delhi government employees, while setting aside the AAP government's commission of inquiry into CNG fitness and Delhi and District Cricket Association, again because of the absence of the LG's concurrence. 
The high court also held as illegal the appointment of the elected government's nominee directors on the boards of BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd, BSES Yamuna power Ltd and Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd by Delhi power company Ltd on the recommendations of the chief minister without communicating the decision of the LG for his Views. The only consolation for the elected government was the court saying the LG could appoint special public prosecutors only on the aid and advice of the council of ministers. 
The battle moved to the Supreme court where a constitution bench took up the clutch of petitions and delivered a landmark ruling in 2018 reversing the high court's decision. The apex court was categorical that beyond the excluded categories of land, public order and police, the LG did not have independent decision-making powers and was bound to act on the aid and advice of the ministers. The bench made it clear that though the decisions of the communicated to the LG, this did not mean his concurrence was required in every case. 
The Supreme court bench also clarified that issues of the various notifications published by Delhi government in exercise of its administrative and legislative powers would be dealt with separately by an appropriate smaller bench. While a huge boost for the AAP government, the constitution bench verdict still left the contentious issue of control of 'services' open, ending with a two-judge bench delivering a split verdict in February 2019. 
After the Centre sought a re-interpretation of Article 239AA of the constitution by a constitution bench on who controlled 'services, the Supreme Court's ruling on Thursday divested the LG of the power crystallised first by the 2015 MHA notification.
Mobile phones in India are ubiquitous - over a billion subscribers. They serve as touch points for multiple needs. Consequently attempts to get people to part with their phone number, often through dubious means, are common. One such example is to get customers to share their phone number to bill retail purchases. It's often done by linking it to the billing system even when it serves no purpose in concluding a transaction. Times of India reported that this method of violating personal data privacy may soon end as the consumer affairs ministry is expected to issue an advisory to stop it. It's a much-needed move. But it doesn't solve the core problem. Invasion of data privacy is not limited to consumer transactions. It's far wider in scope. The only way to check it is to legislate a comprehensive personal data protection law. Absent that, any solution is at best a piecemeal effort. India has lagged in this aspect. As a result, the explosion of digital activity has been accompanied by a surge in extracting personal data without consent. Government of India began the ongoing process of enacting a personal data protection law in 2019. It's gone through many iterations. The bill needs to be introduced in the next parliament session. India's data protection framework should strongly emphasise two principles, data minimization and purpose limitation. The former is the first line of defence against abuse as data collection needs to be limited to just what's relevant to conclude a transaction. The principle of purpose limitation then seeks to ensure that data collected is used for only the stated purpose. While the intent of the consumer affairs ministry is positive, it alone can't ensure Indian's data privacy.
According to the United Nations (UN) population estimates, this year, the population of India surpassed or will surpass that of China. Since 1950, the year the UN began keeping track of population data, China has been the most populous country. In the forthcoming decades, perhaps even centuries, this position will belong to India.
A key question that has resurfaced in this background is whether the large population is the bane of the Indian economy or boon for it. 
Two relevant questions 
In answering this question, the common practice is to compare India to China. But this is wholly misleading since the policy histories of the two countries are vastly different, China is a much richer country today than India. This means that even if it is at a disadvantage purely in terms of the composition of its population - for example, those 65 years or older make 13% of its population against only 7% of India's - it may be better placed to take care of its elderly. 
The right way to pose the question therefore is not a comparison with China but to ask whether on a net basis a younger and larger population is more beneficial than an older and smaller population for the country. 
These are two distinct questions with the first relating to the composition and the second to the size of the population. As such, they must be considered separately in succession.
Young demography helps 
It should be relatively uncontroversial that the advantages of a young population far outweigh its disadvantages. First, a younger population translates in a proportionately large workforce and therefore higher gross domestic product (GDP) given the technology and volume of capital available. 
Second, given that the young save more than the old, a younger population also translates in higher saving and therefore higher investment. The higher investment further adds to the GDP. Finally, a younger population brings greater energy and vibrancy to a nation, leading to more innovation and its greater exploitation. 
A concern commonly expressed about a younger population is that it leads to greater unemployment. But the unemployment rate depends on policies, which surely do not depend on the age composition of the population. 
Underemployment challenge 
Factually, the unemployment rate in India has been consistently low in the 3-5% range. As I have argued in numerous writings, unemployment is not India's problem, it is underemployment. On this score, the output per worker has seen a clear rising trend (meaning declining underemployment) alongside rising workforce in the post-reform era. What is needed is acceleration in this trend. That in turn required further policy reform, not the older population. 
Turning to the size question, I would argue that the benefits of a larger population also far outweigh its costs. There are vast benefits arising from economies of scale in the provision of public goods. Takes, for example, India's digital infrastructure. Once this infrastructure is created, it is there for all to use.
Beijing: As China tries to slow its demographic decline, women like Chen Luojin could be part of the solution. The divorced 33-years-old lives in Chengdu, capital of the southwestern Sichuan province, which legalised registration of children by unmarried women in february, something China is considering implementing nationwide to address record low birth rates.
The changes mean unmarried woman can take paid maternity leave and receive child subsidies previously only available to married couples. Crucially Chen could access invitro fertility (IVF) treatment legally in a private clinic. She is now 10 weeks pregnant. "Becoming a single parent is not for everyone but I am happy with the decision," said Chen, who works in logistics."Equally, getting married or not is for each individual to decide. We have liberalised the policies here and I know a lot of single women are doing IVF."
Concerned about China's first population drop in six decades and its rapid ageing, the government's political advisers proposed in March that single and unmarried women should have access to egg freezing and IVF treatment But leaders haven't commented publicly on the recommendations.
Liberalising IVF nationwide could unleash more demand for fertility treatment in what is already the world's biggest market straining limited fertility services. Some investors in the industry see an opportunity to expand.
"If China changes their policy to allow single women to have children this can result in an increase of IVF demand, "said Yve Lyppens, director of business development for Asia Pacific at INVO Bioscience,which is awaiting regulatory approval to launch its IVF technology in China after signing a distribution agreement with Guangzhou-based Onesky Holdings last year.
Shanghai and the southern Guangdong province have also permitted unmarried women to register their children but IVF services for single women remain banned
SC's judgment on Delhi govt and LG reaffirms the principles of representative govt and federalism The Supreme court verdict that will hopefully settle the acrimonious dispute between APP's Delhi government and the Lieutenant Governor-the issue was who controls administrative services-is a reaffirmation of federalism and the principle that people's choice of a government must matter. India's Capital has been hosting an unedifying spectacle, and SC's clear verdict should leave all parties in no doubt where their power begins and ends. The political party rivalry between BJP and AAP will sharpen. But that's alright in a democracy. What's not is schoolyard-like fights everyday.
While the issue decided by the constitution bench was whether the Delhi government has legislative and executive powers over the city's bureaucracy, that fight engendered many others. From teachers training to power subsidies, AAP has accused successive LGs of interference, and LGs have returned accusations of 'impropriety' and worse. The bitter public battles resulted in a bureaucracy caught in the middle of warring chiefs and severely affected governance. LG annulling, rejecting, removing appointments made by the Delhi government was one part of the story. There were other theatrics-a strike by administrative officers following an allegation that an AAP MLA had assaulted an officer. At the time, in a first, the CM and three ministers camped at LG's office/residence overnight demanding to direct the striking officers to call off the protest. Delhi has had enough of this. 
SC had said GOI taking over executive powers of an elected government would "completely abrogate the federal system of governance and the principle of representative democracy"; and that "the permanent executive, consisting of unelected civil service officers... may act in ways that disregard the will of the electorate." That's a lesson for everyone. When people elect governments, governments must, within well- understood constitutional boundaries, be allowed to govern, including in allocating duties to officers. And if duly elected state governments must always be in lockstep with the Centre then there isn't much to be said about our federalism. The chatter after the SC verdict is that AAP is again the boss of the Delhi government. The more profound point is that the people are the boss.
Read the following passage and answer the next five questions by choosing the correct options:
Multicultural emphasises the importance of cultural diversity. It recognises the dignity and importance of cultural distinctiveness. It reiterates that cultural differences are natural phenomena. Cultural diversity, diverse ideas, perspectives and beliefs enhance our vision of a better society. Multiculturalism stands for heterogeneity and diversity. It is an inclusive process in which all cultures are valued.
In India, immigration and multiculturalism are as old as recorded history. Since time immemorial, wave after wave of ethnically and culturally diverse people have poured into India, settled here, and assimilated into its mosaic. Each community, while interacting and being influenced by the others, retained its own identity. customs, beliefs and ways of life. It has truly been said that Indian culture is a 'culture of cultures', like a beehive of interlocking cells.
Hinduism has played a seminal role in shaping the Indian mind and character. It has dogma, no prophet, no single sacred book. It believes in freedom of thought and expression. It encompasses different forms of belief: monotheism, polytheism, agnosticism as well as atheism. Hinduism is also the foundation of a general sprit of tolerance and acceptance of the 'other', the belief that different paths can lead to the same goal. Hinduism's flexibility has endowed Indian civilisation with a unique resilience and power of absorptive survival.
The 700 years of Muslim rule from the 11-12th century bequeathed a mixed legacy. Politically, Islam in India represented subjugation. But culturally, it generated outstanding creative achievement and synthesis. The centuries of Muslim rule impacted all aspects of Indian life producing a composite Indi-Islamic culture.
British colonial rule replaced Muslim rule, adding one more layer to India's plural personality. India's exposure to the West was both debilitating and nourishing. On the one hand, colonial rule devalued Indian civilisation by claiming and justifying 'civilising mission' of British. On the other hand, the work of great European Ideologists helped India rediscover her classical literature, her forgotten wisdom and values.
It is striking how the intellectual journey of the leaders of the Indian renaissance went from India to the the West, before returning to India with a new-found sense of Indianness. All of them represented a mingling of East and West, a synthesis of European and Indian thought.
This was the background to the emergence of an independent, democratic India in 1947, after the bloodbath of Partition. We are the most complex and diverse society on earth. Today's India has over a billion Hindus, 150 million Muslims, 24 million Christians and 24 million Sikhs, apart from several smaller but important denominations. In addition to English and Hindi, we speak more than 20 major languages and some 22,000 dialects. Each religion is further sliced and diced by caste, sub-caste and region. There are also thousands of tribal groups with distinct ethnic and cultural identities. Each of India's states has its own centuries-old flourishing culture, with further internal diversions.
On the basis of your reading of the following excerpt, answer the questions that follow:
On the rack in the railway carriage immediately opposite Clovis was a solidly wrought travelling bag with a carefully written label, on which was inscribed, J.P Huddle, The Warren Tifield, near Slowborough." Immediately below the rack sat the human embodiment of the label, a solid, sedate individual, sedately dressed, sedately conversational. Even without his conversation (which was addressed to a friend seated by his side, and touched chiefly on such topic as the backwardness of roman hyacinths and the prevalence of measles at the rectory), one could have gauged fairly accurately the temperament and mental outlook of the travelling bag's owner. But he seemed unwilling to leave anything to the imagination of a casual observer, and his talk grew presently personal and introspective.
I don't know how it is, "he told his friend "I am not much over forty, but I seem to have settled down into a deep groove of elderly middle-age. My sister shows the same tendency. We like everything to be exactly in its accustomed place; we like things to happen exactly at their appointed times; we like everything to be usual, orderly, punctual, methodical, to a hair's breadth, o a minute. It distresses and upset us if it is not so. For instance, to take a very trifling matter, a thrush has built its nest year after year in the catkin-tree on the lawn; this year, for no obvious reason, it is building in the ivy on the garden wall. We have said very little about it, but I think we both feel that the change is unnecessary, and just a little irritating."
"Perhaps" said the friend, "it is a different thrush."
We have suspected that," said J.P. Huddle, "and I think it give us even more cause for annoyance. We don't feel that we want a change of thrush at our time of life; and yet, as I have said, we have scarely reached an age when these things should make themselves seriously felt".