We are given an \(n \times n\) square matrix to be filled with numerals such that:
This means each cell is considered to be adjacent to all 8 surrounding cells (if they exist). Therefore, each numeral must differ from all those around it.
For a \(3 \times 3\) matrix, using the adjacency rule, the minimum number of numerals required can be found by trying to color the grid such that no two adjacent cells share the same number.
One possible arrangement using 4 numerals:
| 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 4 | 1 | 2 |
| 3 | 4 | 1 |
Here, each numeral is surrounded by different numerals in all directions, satisfying the condition.
✅ Minimum number of numerals required: 4
To solve the problem of determining the minimum number of different numerals needed to fill a 5×5 square matrix such that no two adjacent cells have the same numeral, let's analyze the situation step by step.
1. Definition of "adjacent": A cell is adjacent to another cell if it touches horizontally, vertically, or diagonally, which means each cell has up to 8 possible adjacent cells (except at edges and corners). Therefore, no two adjacent cells can have the same numeral.
2. Strategy: We must color the matrix with the minimum number of different numerals based on the condition of adjacency. This is equivalent to a graph-coloring problem where adjacent vertices (cells) cannot share the same color (numeral).
3. Pattern Consideration: Since this is essentially a graph theory problem on a 2D grid, it is recognized that a checkerboard pattern could minimize the number of colors, achieving a pattern where adjacent cells always have different numerals.
4. Checkerboard Pattern: This pattern uses two colors effectively. One numeral for all "black" cells and another for all "white" cells (using a chessboard analogy). Thus, every cell is different from its adjacent ones:
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
5. Conclusion: Due to the checkerboard configuration, only two numerals are necessary to fill the matrix, satisfying all adjacency conditions. Hence, the minimum number of different numerals required to fill a 5×5 matrix, respecting the adjacency constraint, is 2.
6. Verification against range: The range provided is 4,4. However, the solution identifies that only 2 numerals are sufficient when considering a checkerboard pattern, which is less than the proposed range. This suggests an optimal solution beyond initial expectations.
To solve this problem, we need to fill a 5×5 matrix with numerals such that no two adjacent cells have the same numeral. Here, we are allowed one mistake where one pair of adjacent cells can have the same numeral. The task is to determine the minimum number of different numerals required.
Let's analyze the condition if no mistake was allowed. The optimal strategy to fill the matrix would be similar to a checkerboard pattern using 4 numerals (like a typical 2-color pattern in chess), where no two adjacent cells share the same numeral.
For instance, consider a pattern using numerals 1, 2, 3, and 4:
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
In this pattern, each cell is surrounded by other cells with different numerals, satisfying the problem's condition without mistakes.
However, we are allowed one mistake. This means one pair of adjacent cells might have the same numeral. Even with this allowance, the pattern using 4 different numerals remains valid as it handles adjacency efficiently.
Thus, the minimum number of different numerals required to fill the 5×5 matrix, considering the one allowed mistake, is 4.
To solve the problem of determining the minimum number of different numerals needed to fill a 5×5 square matrix, where no two adjacent cells can have the same numeral, we essentially aim to create a coloring pattern that ensures this condition.
Step-by-step Solution:
1. Understand adjacency: Adjacent cells include those touching horizontally, vertically, or diagonally. For a cell in the center, this means 8 adjacent cells. For corner cells, there are 3 adjacent cells, and for edge cells (not corners), there are 5 adjacent cells.
2. Color Graph Theory: In graph theory, this is similar to coloring a graph where each cell is a vertex, and edges exist between adjacent cells. The problem determines the chromatic number (minimum colors) of this graph.
3. Analyze Patterns: For smaller n×n matrices (such as 2×2), it's clear that 4 numerals are needed. Extending to 3×3 requires at least 5 numerals to avoid repeating a numeral in any paths originating from the center.
4. Test Larger Patterns: For the 5×5 matrix, symmetry or periodic coloring patterns suggest that numbers cycle after reaching particular configurations.
5. Validate: Deploy the pattern and check for potential numeral repetition:
Assign numerals in a repetitive L-shaped pattern diagonally, ensuring coverage of all edges.
Using this method in a larger grid ensures all conditions met with minimal numerals.
Conclusion: Following the above logic and ensuring edge compliance, the minimum number of different numerals required is 9, as to fill bigger matrices systematically and satisfy adjacency constraints, larger indices would be unavoidable without covering adjacent possibilities.
Three countries — Pumpland (P), Xiland (X), and Cheeseland (C) — trade among themselves and with the other countries in Rest of World (ROW). All trade volumes are given in IC (international currency). The following terminology is used:
• Trade balance = Exports– Imports
• Total trade = Exports + Imports
• Normalized trade balance = Trade balance / Total trade, expressed in percentage terms
The following information is known:
• The normalized trade balances of P, X, and C are 0%, 10%, and–20%, respectively.
• 40%of exports of X are to P. 22% of imports of P are from X.
• 90%of exports of C are to P; 4% are to ROW.
• 12%of exports of ROW are to X, 40% are to P.
• The export volumes of P, in IC, to X and C are 600 and 1200, respectively. P is the only country that exports to C.
Seven children, Aarav, Bina, Chirag, Diya, Eshan, Farhan, and Gaurav, are sitting in a circle facing inside (not necessarily in the same order) and playing a game of ’Passing the Buck’.
The game is played over 10 rounds. In each round, the child holding the Buck must pass it directly to a child sitting in one of the following positions:
• Immediately to the left;
• Immediately to the right;
• Second to the left;
• Second to the right.
The game starts with Bina passing the Buck and ends with Chirag receiving the Buck. The table below provides some information about the pass types and the child receiving the Buck. Some information is missing and labelled as ’?’.v
Aurevia, Brelosia, Cyrenia and Zerathania are four countries with their currencies being Aurels, Brins, Crowns, and Zentars, respectively. The currencies have different exchange values. Crown’s currency exchange rate with Zentars = 0.5, i.e., 1 Crown is worth 0.5 Zentars.
Three travelers, Jano, Kira, and Lian set out from Zerathania visiting exactly two of the countries. Each country is visited by exactly two travelers. Each traveler has a unique Flight Cost, which represents the total cost of airfare in traveling to both the countries and back to Zerathania. The Flight Cost of Jano was 4000 Zentars, while that of the other two travelers were 5000 and 6000 Zentars, not necessarily in that order. When visiting a country, a traveler spent either 1000, 2000 or 3000 in the country’s local currency. Each traveler had different spends (in the country’s local currency) in the two countries he/she visited. Across all the visits, there were exactly two spends of 1000 and exactly one spend of 3000 (in the country’s local currency).
The total “Travel Cost” for a traveler is the sum of his/her Flight Cost and the money spent in the countries visited.
The citizens of the four countries with knowledge of these travels made a few observations, with spends measured in their respective local currencies:
• Aurevia citizen: Jano and Kira visited our country, and their Travel Costs were 3500 and 8000, respectively.
• Brelosia citizen: Kira and Lian visited our country, spending 2000 and 3000, respectively. Kira’s Travel Cost was 4000.
• Cyrenia citizen: Lian visited our country and her Travel Cost was 36000.
The following charts depict details of research papers written by four authors, Arman, Brajen, Chintan, and Devon. The papers were of four types, single-author, two-author, three-author, and four-author, that is, written by one, two, three, or all four of these authors, respectively. No other authors were involved in writing these papers. 
The following additional facts are known.
1. Each of the authors wrote at least one of each of the four types of papers.
2. The four authors wrote different numbers of single-author papers.
3. Both Chintan and Devon wrote more three-author papers than Brajen.
4. The number of single-author and two-author papers written by Brajen were the same.
Anu, Bijay, Chetan, Deepak, Eshan, and Faruq are six friends. Each of them uses a mobile number from exactly one of the two mobile operators- Xitel and Yocel. During the last month, the six friends made several calls to each other. Each call was made by one of these six friends to another. The table below summarizes the number of minutes of calls that each of the six made to (outgoing minutes to) and received from (incoming minutes from) these friends, grouped by the operators. Some of the entries are missing.
Operator Xitel Operator Yocel
It is known that the duration of calls from Faruq to Eshan was 200 minutes. Also, there were no calls from:
• Bijay to Eshan,
• Chetan to Anu and Chetan to Deepak,
• Deepak to Bijay and Deepak to Faruq,
• Eshan to Chetan and Eshan to Deepak.