Step 1: Reactivity comparison.
- In chloroethane, the C–Cl bond is a simple polar covalent bond; chlorine can easily undergo nucleophilic substitution.
- In chlorobenzene, the lone pair of chlorine interacts with the benzene ring (\(\pi\)-resonance). This delocalisation gives partial double bond character to the C–Cl bond.
Step 2: Effect of resonance.
Due to resonance:
1. Bond length of C–Cl decreases.
2. Bond strength increases.
3. Nucleophilic substitution becomes difficult.
Step 3: Reaction with Cl$_2$.
In presence of FeCl\(_3\), chlorobenzene undergoes electrophilic substitution:
\[
C_6H_5Cl + Cl_2 \xrightarrow{FeCl_3} C_6H_4Cl_2 + HCl
\]
Products: 1,2-dichlorobenzene (ortho) and 1,4-dichlorobenzene (para).
Step 4: Reaction with conc. H$_2$SO$_4$.
Sulphonation occurs:
\[
C_6H_5Cl + H_2SO_4 \xrightarrow{\Delta} C_6H_4ClSO_3H + H_2O
\]
Product: p-chlorobenzene sulphonic acid (major).
Step 5: Conclusion.
Thus, chlorobenzene is less reactive than chloroethane due to resonance, and it undergoes electrophilic substitution with Cl\(_2\) and H\(_2\)SO\(_4\).