Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The Doctrine of Lapse was an annexation policy followed by the British East India Company in India. It stated that if the ruler of a princely state under British suzerainty died without a natural heir, the state would be annexed by the British.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The Doctrine of Lapse is most famously associated with Lord Dalhousie, who was the Governor-General of India from 1848 to 1856. Although the policy existed before him, he implemented it vigorously to expand British territory in India. Several prominent states, including Satara (1848), Jaipur and Sambalpur (1849), Nagpur, and Jhansi (1853), were annexed under this doctrine. [4] This policy was one of the major political causes of the 1857 Revolt.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The policy was introduced and widely applied by Lord Dalhousie. Therefore, option (i) in the original image, which is option (A), is the correct answer.
”The British element is gone, but they have left the mischief behind”
It is no use saying that we ask for separate electorates, because it is good for us. We have heard it long enough. We have heard it for years, and as a result of this agitation we are now a separate nation ... Can you show me one free country where there are separate electorates? If so, I shall be prepared to accept it. But in this unfortunate country if this separate electorate is going to be persisted in, even after the division of the country, woe betide the country; it is not worth living in. Therefore, I say, it is not for my good alone, it is for your own good that I say it, forget the past. One day, we may be united ... The British element is gone, but they have left the mischief behind. We do not want to perpetuate that mischief. (Hear, hear). When the British introduced this element they had not expected that they will have to go so soon. They wanted it for their easy administration. That is all right. But they have left the legacy behind. Are we to get out of it or not?
Charkha
What I object to, is the craze for machinery as such. The craze is for what they call labour-saving machinery. Men go on ”saving labour”, till thousands are without work and thrown on the open streets to die of starvation. I want to save time and labour, not for a fraction of mankind, but for all; I want the concentration of wealth, not in the hands of few, but in the hands of all. YOUNG INDIA, 13 NOVEMBER 1924 Khaddar does not seek to destroy all machinery but it does regulate its use and check its weedy growth. It uses machinery for the service of the poorest in their own cottages. The wheel is itself an exquisite piece of machinery. YOUNG INDIA, 17 MARCH 1927
Match List-I with List-II:
| List-I (Leaders) | List-II (Regions) |
|---|---|
| (A) Shah Mal | (I) Pargana Barout in Uttar Pradesh |
| (B) Gonoo | (II) Singhbhum in Chotanagpur |
| (C) Birjis Qadr | (III) Awadh |
| (D) Kunwar Singh | (IV) Arrah in Bihar |
Choose the correct answer from the options given below: