



To solve this question, we need to understand the concept of Fraunhofer diffraction due to a single slit. In such a diffraction pattern, the intensity distribution is characterized by a central maximum that is much brighter and wider than the subsequent minima and side fringes.
The intensity \(I(\theta)\) as a function of the angle \(\theta\) (or equivalently, the position \(x\) on the screen) is given by:
\(I(\theta) = I_0 \left( \frac{\sin(\beta)}{\beta} \right)^2\)
where \(\beta = \frac{\pi a}{\lambda} \sin \theta\), \(a\) is the slit width, and \(\lambda\) is the wavelength of the light.
This function results in a central maximum (principal maximum) with intensity \(I_0\) and diminishing secondary maxima (side lobes) on either side separated by dark fringes (minima).
Let us justify why the given correct image depicts this pattern accurately:
Therefore, the correct figure illustrating the intensity distribution for Fraunhofer diffraction due to a single slit is selected based on these characteristics.
By analyzing these features, we can confirm that the selected figure accurately represents the intensity distribution of light for single-slit Fraunhofer diffraction.
