Let's examine each statement about polar molecules to identify the false one:
(A) Centers of positive and negative charges are separated in the absence of external electric field. This is true. Polar molecules have a permanent dipole moment due to differences in electronegativity between the atoms. This means the centers of positive and negative charges are inherently separated even without an external field.
(B) Centers of positive and negative charges are separated in the presence of external electric field. This is true. An external electric field will further polarize the molecule, increasing the charge separation. Even nonpolar molecules experience some charge separation in an external field (induced dipole).
(C) Do not possess permanent dipole moments. This is false. This statement is the opposite of the definition of a polar molecule. Polar molecules, by definition, do possess permanent dipole moments.
(D) Ionic molecule HCl is the example of polar molecule. This is true. HCl is a classic example of a polar molecule due to the significant electronegativity difference between hydrogen and chlorine. Though often confused, ionic bonds have much larger electronegativity differences than polar bonds.
The correct answer is (C) Do not possess permanent dipole moments.
A beam of unpolarised light of intensity \( I_0 \) is passed through a polaroid A and then through another polaroid B which is oriented so that its principal plane makes an angle of 45° relative to that of A. The intensity of emergent light is:
Two polaroide $A$ and $B$ are placed in such a way that the pass-axis of polaroids are perpendicular to each other Now, another polaroid $C$ is placed between $A$ and $B$ bisecting angle between them If intensity of unpolarized light is $I _0$ then intensity of transmitted light after passing through polaroid $B$ will be: