Question

Which of the inferences can be drawn if everything said in the passage were assumed to be true? 
 

• A. Rebellions are fuelled by social reforms and avoided by supporting established authorities or continuing the present state of affairs.
• B. The American policy towards Asia can be called an overall success, though small in magnitude.
• C. Kennedy, in 1958, wanted America to aid South American countries to acquire more support in their fight against communism.
• D. Eisenhower rejected the Marshall Plan, whereas Kennedy implemented a similar one.

Hint:

When asked to infer, connect cause-effect facts directly stated in the passage - avoid speculation.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is D

- Step 1: The passage clearly states Eisenhower rejected a Marshall Plan for Latin America proposed by Brazil.
- Step 2: It also states that Kennedy proposed the "Alliance for Progress," which was "designed to do for Latin America what Marshall Plan had done for Europe."
- Step 3: This makes (d) a correct inference based on fact.
- Step 4: Option (a) misrepresents the logic - rebellions were caused by neglect, not reform.
- Step 5: Option (b) is incorrect - the passage calls Asia a "disappointing balance."
- Step 6: Option (c) distorts Kennedy's 1958 stance - he emphasized improving living standards, not gaining support in war.