Step 1: Recalling case law.
Subhash Kumar held that Article 21 includes the right to pollution-free water and air as part of the right to life.
Step 2: Why others are incorrect.
Other cases deal with custodial death compensation, children’s rights, and right to livelihood—not pollution rights.
Step 3: Conclusion.
Thus, the correct case expanding Article 21 is Subhash Kumar.