Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
The question asks for a critical characteristic or strategy that enables fruit crops to be tolerant to drought conditions found in drylands.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
Let's analyze the options as mechanisms for drought tolerance:
\[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{1. Large stomata: This is incorrect. Plants adapted to dry conditions (xerophytes) typically have smaller, sunken, or fewer stomata to reduce water loss through transpiration. } \\ \bullet & \text{2. Shallow root system: This is incorrect. A deep and extensive root system is a key adaptation for drought tolerance, as it allows the plant to explore a larger volume of soil and access water from deeper layers. } \\ \bullet & \text{3. Large sized leaves: This is incorrect. Large leaves have a greater surface area, which increases water loss via transpiration. Drought-tolerant plants often have small, modified, or waxy leaves. } \\ \bullet & \text{4. Short duration varieties: This is a correct and critical strategy known as "drought escape". By having a short life cycle, these varieties can complete their growth and reproductive phases during the brief period when moisture is available (e.g., the rainy season), thus escaping the most severe period of drought. This is a very effective parameter for successful cultivation in drylands. } \\ \end{array}\]
Step 3: Final Answer:
Short duration varieties are a critical parameter for drought tolerance in dryland fruits.
Match the LIST-I (Spectroscopy) with LIST-II (Application)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Visible light spectroscopy | III. Identification on the basis of color |
B. Fluorescence spectroscopy | IV. Identification on the basis of fluorophore present |
C. FTIR spectroscopy | I. Identification on the basis of absorption in infrared region |
D. Mass Spectroscopy | II. Identification on the basis of m/z ion |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Forensic Psychiatry | III. Behavioural pattern of criminal |
B. Forensic Engineering | IV. Origin of metallic fracture |
C. Forensic Odontology | I. Bite marks analysis |
D. Computer Forensics | II. Information derived from digital devices |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Calvin Goddard | II. Forensic Ballistics |
B. Karl Landsteiner | III. Blood Grouping |
C. Albert Osborn | IV. Document examination |
D. Mathieu Orfila | I. Forensic Toxicology |
Match the LIST-I (Evidence, etc.) with LIST-II (Example, Construction etc.)
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Biological evidence | IV. Blood |
B. Latent print evidence | III. Fingerprints |
C. Trace evidence | II. Soil |
D. Digital evidence | I. Cell phone records |
Match the LIST-I with LIST-II
LIST-I | LIST-II |
---|---|
A. Ridges | III. The raised portion of the friction skin of the fingers |
B. Type Lines | I. Two most inner ridges which start parallel, diverge and surround or tend to surround the pattern area |
C. Delta | IV. The ridge characteristics nearest to the point of divergence of type lines |
D. Enclosure | II. A single ridge bifurcates and reunites to enclose some space |