Question:

Whenever, our pet Johny falls sick, he just sniffs the food but does not eat. If forced, he pisses on the side of the food-plate. Later, I came across a study conducted by SAN’s School of Vets that such behaviour of pets is an indication of diabetes among dogs. This made me to conclude that Johny is suffering from diabetes.
Which one of the Mill’s methods is used here for arriving at the conclusion?

Show Hint

Mill’s Method of Agreement is useful when the same effect is observed under various conditions with one common factor.
Updated On: Apr 26, 2025
  • Method of Agreement
  • Method of Difference
  • Method of Concomitant Variation
  • Method of Residues
Hide Solution
collegedunia
Verified By Collegedunia

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understand Mill’s Method of Agreement.
This method identifies a common factor in multiple instances where a particular effect occurs. If a certain factor is always present when the effect is observed, it is likely the cause.

Step 2: Apply to the case of Johny.
The behavior (sniffing but not eating, urinating by the plate) matches findings in a veterinary study that link such behavior with diabetes. The common factor — similar behavior in other diabetic dogs — is used to infer the cause.

Step 3: Conclusion.
Since the behavior matches that found in the study, and those instances all indicated diabetes, the method of agreement is used to arrive at the conclusion.
Was this answer helpful?
0
0

Questions Asked in GATE XH- C4 exam

View More Questions