To determine the increasing order of basic strength, we need to consider the factors that affect the basicity of amines:
Let's analyze the given compounds:
C2H5NH2 (Ethylamine): A primary aliphatic amine.
(C2H5)2NH (Diethylamine): A secondary aliphatic amine.
(C2H5)3N (Triethylamine): A tertiary aliphatic amine.
C6H5NH2 (Aniline): An aromatic amine.
Based on these factors:
Aniline (C6H5NH2) is the least basic due to resonance delocalization.
Among the aliphatic amines, secondary amines are generally the most basic due to a combination of inductive and solvation effects.
Primary amines are less basic than secondary amines but more basic than tertiary amines due to steric hindrance in tertiary amines.
Therefore, the increasing order of basic strength is:
C6H5NH2 < C2H5NH2 < (C2H5)3N < (C2H5)2NH
The correct answer is:
Option 2: C6H5NH2 < C2H5NH2 < (C2H5)3N < (C2H5)2NH
Amines have a lone pair of electrons on the nitrogen atom, due to which they behave as Lewis bases. Greater the value of \( K_b \) or smaller the value of \( pK_b \), stronger is the base. Amines are more basic than alcohols, ethers, esters, etc. The basic character of aliphatic amines should increase with the increase of alkyl substitution. However, it does not occur in a regular manner, as a secondary aliphatic amine is unexpectedly more basic than a tertiary amine in aqueous solutions. Aromatic amines are weaker bases than ammonia and aliphatic amines. Electron-releasing groups such as \( -CH_3 \), \( -NH_2 \), etc., increase the basicity, while electron-withdrawing substituents such as \( -NO_2 \), \( -CN \), halogens, etc., decrease the basicity of amines. The effect of these substituents is more pronounced at the para-position than at the meta-position.
(a) Arrange the following in increasing order of their basic character. Give reason:
\[
\includegraphics[width=0.5\linewidth]{ch29i.png}
\]