Under the Indian Constitution, the President of India can impose President’s Rule in a state under Article 356. This provision allows the President to take control of the administration in a state when the governance of the state is not functioning as per the constitutional provisions, thus leading to the suspension of the state government.
Article 356 is a crucial provision in the Constitution that deals with situations where the President believes that the state government is unable to function in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution. This article provides the President with the power to dissolve the state legislature, dismiss the state government, and assume executive authority over the state.
The President’s Rule can be invoked under the following circumstances:
The process under Article 356 begins when the President is satisfied that a situation has arisen where the government of a state cannot be carried out according to the provisions of the Constitution. The President may then issue a proclamation, which leads to the imposition of President's Rule. During this period, the President exercises executive authority, and the state legislature is either dissolved or suspended, with the Governor administering the state on behalf of the President.
Once invoked, President’s Rule can remain in effect for a period of six months, but it must be ratified by both Houses of Parliament to continue beyond that period. The President’s Rule can be extended indefinitely, but each extension must be approved by Parliament. This provision ensures that the President’s Rule is not imposed arbitrarily, and parliamentary oversight is required to extend its duration.
In conclusion, Article 356 is the correct provision that empowers the President to impose President’s Rule in a state when there is a breakdown of governance or constitutional machinery. This ensures that the state can be governed directly by the President through the appointed Governor until normalcy is restored.
Criminology is the scientific and jurisprudential study of crime, criminal behaviour, and the penal response of the state. It operates at the intersection of law, sociology, psychology, and public policy. Its foundational principle is nullum crimen sine lege, nulla poena sine lege, stressing that there is no crime nor punishment without a pre-existing law. Traditional criminology was shaped by the Classical School, emphasizing free will and rationality. Influenced by Bentham’s utilitarianism, it viewed punishment as a deterrent mechanism, echoing audi alteram partem in demanding procedural fairness. In contrast, the Positivist School, focused on biological, psychological, and sociological causes of criminality, thereby shifting from retributive justice to rehabilitative models.
Modern criminology encompasses diverse domains like victimology, penology, white-collar crime, cybercrime, and transnational offences. The traditional ele ments of crime, mens rea and actus reus remain crucial. However, strict liability offences and corporate crimes often challenge this binary. With the advent of globalization, criminology now interfaces with international criminal law, human rights jurisprudence, and restorative justice. It aims to reintegrate the offender and provide restitution to victims. Furthermore, critical criminology interrogates how law disproportionately penalizes marginalized groups, reflecting concerns of penal populism, mass incarceration, and criminalization of poverty. This evolving discipline critiques not just criminal behaviour but the social construction of de viance itself.
Under the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 a mortgage is a transfer of an interest in specific immovable property for securing the payment of a debt. Section 58 of the Act enumerates six distinct types of mortgages, each characterized by unique rights and obligations of the mortgagor and mortgagee. These categories reflect the balance of right of alienation and right to hold the property, contingent upon the nature of the transfer. In a simple mortgage, the mortgagor binds himself personally to repay the debt and agrees, expressly or impliedly, that in the event of default, the mortgagee shall have the right to cause the mortgaged property to be sold. There is no transfer of possession.
A mortgage by conditional sale involves an ostensible sale with a condition that upon default of payment, the sale becomes absolute. Courts scrutinize such arrangements to prevent clogs on the equity of redemption. A usufructuary mortgage grants the mortgagee possession and the right to receive rents and profits in lieu of interest or principal, aligning with the maxim, nemo dat quod non habet. It is essential to note that an earlier mortgage takes precedence based on the legal maxim, qui prior est tempore potior est jure. An English mortgage entails personal liability of the mortgagor and an absolute transfer of the property to the mortgagee with a covenant to retransfer upon payment. Other forms include mortgage by deposit of title deeds or equitable mortgage, and anomalous mortgages, which do not fit into the above classifications. These variations reveal the nuanced jurisprudence of secured transactions, balancing contractual freedom with equitable oversight.