Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) consists of the following except:
Show Hint
- All persons lineally descended from a common ancestor and includes their wives
- Unmarried daughters
- A stranger who has been residing with the family for 10 years
- Head of the HUF ”Karta”
The Correct Option is C
Solution and Explanation
A Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) includes members who are lineally descended from a common ancestor, their wives, and unmarried daughters. However, a stranger, even if residing with the family for an extended period, does not become a part of the HUF as per the Income Tax Act, 1961
Top Questions on Income Tax Law and Accounts
- \(\textbf{Match List-I with List-II:}\)
\[\begin{array}{|l|l|} \hline \textbf{List-I} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Deposit in Sukanya Samriddhi Account} & \text{(I) 80E} \\ \hline \text{(B) Interest on loan for higher education} & \text{(II) 80D} \\ \hline \text{(C) Preventive health checkup} & \text{(III) 80GG} \\ \hline \text{(D) Rent paid for accommodation} & \text{(IV) 80C} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Commerce
- Income Tax Law and Accounts
Match List-I with List-II:
\[\begin{array}{|l|l|} \hline \textbf{List-I} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Sale of jewelry} & \text{(I) Income from Salary} \\ \hline \text{(B) Pension from former employer} & \text{(II) Capital gain/loss} \\ \hline \text{(C) Salary received from a partnership firm} & \text{(III) Income from other sources} \\ \hline \text{(D) Income from sub-letting of property} & \text{(IV) Profits and gains from business or profession} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Commerce
- Income Tax Law and Accounts
- Which of the following statements is incorrect?
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Commerce
- Income Tax Law and Accounts
- Which of the following statements are true? (A) Agricultural income earned in India is exempted from tax
(B) Scheme of partial integration is available for individual, HUF, AOP, BOI or artificial judicial person
(C) For partial integration, net agricultural income of the individual assessee during the previous year should not exceed Rs. 5000
(D) For partial integration, non-agricultural taxable income should exceed the exemption limit- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Commerce
- Income Tax Law and Accounts
Match List-I with List-II:
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Commerce
- Income Tax Law and Accounts
Questions Asked in CUET PG exam
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{Provision} & \textbf{Case Law} \\ \hline \text{(A) Strict Liability} & \text{(1) Ryland v. Fletcher} \\ \hline \text{(B) Absolute Liability} & \text{(II) M.C. Mehta v. Union of India} \\ \hline \text{(C) Negligence} & \text{(III) Nicholas v. Marsland} \\ \hline \text{(D) Act of God} & \text{(IV) MCD v. Subhagwanti} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Law of Torts
Match List-I with List-II\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Hadley v. Baxendale} & \text{(1) Undue Influence} \\ \hline \text{(B) Henkel v. Pape} & \text{(II) Coercion} \\ \hline \text{(C) Manu Singh v. Umadat Pandey} & \text{(III) Quantum of Damages} \\ \hline \text{(D) Chikkam Amiraju v. Seshamma} & \text{(IV) Mistake} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Contract Law
Match List-I with List-II
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Complete Justice} & \text{(I) Article 137} \\ \hline \text{(B) Special Leave Petition} & \text{(II) Article 131} \\ \hline \text{(C) Review of the Judgments} & \text{(III) Article 142} \\ \hline \text{(D) Original Jurisdiction} & \text{(IV) Article 136} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Judicial Process
Match List-I with List-II
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Indian Constitution
Match List-I with List-II
\[\begin{array}{|c|c|} \hline \textbf{List-1} & \textbf{List-II} \\ \hline \text{(A) Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State of Punjab} & \text{(I) Separation of powers} \\ \hline \text{(B) Delhi Laws Act, 1912} & \text{(II) Delegated legislation} \\ \hline \text{(C) Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India} & \text{(III) Doctrine of proportionality} \\ \hline \text{(D) Om Kumar v. Union of India} & \text{(IV) Post decisional hearing} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
- CUET (PG) - 2025
- Administrative Law