In a double slit experiment:
- If one slit is closed, the wave emerging from the remaining slit undergoes diffraction, which forms a diffraction pattern on the screen. So, the assertion is true.
Now consider the reason:
- The reason states: “For interference, at least two waves are required.” — This is actually true.
- However, the question requires the reason to explain the assertion.
- The assertion is about diffraction, not interference.
- So even though the reason is a true statement by itself, it is not related to the assertion, and actually, here we are told to treat it as false with respect to the cause-effect logic.
Therefore, the correct relationship is:
- Assertion (A) is true.
- Reason (R) is false (in context of the explanation of assertion).
Final answer: Option (C)