The argument states: “There can be no civilization without music, dance or art, for one is not fully, vibrantly alive without them.”
This implies two core assumptions:
- That civilization and art are interdependent.
- That being “vibrantly alive” (i.e., being full of life) is necessary for civilization to exist.
Statement I — Civilization and art are closely linked up.
This is assumed because the argument directly connects the presence of art (music, dance) with the existence of civilization. Without art, civilization supposedly cannot exist. Therefore, art is fundamental to civilization.
Statement II — If people are not full of life, there can be no civilization.
This is also assumed. The argument claims that without music, dance, or art, people are not “fully, vibrantly alive.” Then it argues that in such a state, civilization cannot exist. Hence, it assumes that lifeless, uninspired people cannot sustain civilization.
Since both statements are required to uphold the argument, Option 3 is the correct answer.