Step 1: Interpret the conditions and establish size relations. A ping occurs whenever the diameter of a ball is less than or equal to the diameter of a hoop. Using the given rules, we determine the relative sizes of the balls and hoops. From Rule 4, ball \(B2\) fits into hoop \(H2\), while all other balls are larger than \(H2\). Hence, \(B2\) is the smallest ball. From Rule 3, ball \(B3\) is larger than \(H1\), whereas all other balls are less than or equal to \(H1\). Thus, \(B3\) is the largest ball. Rule 2 implies \(B1 > H3\) and \(B4 \le H3\), giving \(B1 > B4\). Rule 1 states \(B5 > H4\), while \(B1 \le H4\) and \(B6 \le H4\), which implies \(B5 > B1\) and \(B5 > B6\). Combining these deductions, the balls are ordered as \[ B3 > B5 > B1 > B4 > B2, \] and the hoops are ordered as \[ H1 > H4 > H3 > H2. \] Step 2: Count pings for each required ball. For ball \(B1\): \[ B1 \le H1 \Rightarrow \text{ping}, \quad B1 > H2 \Rightarrow \text{no ping}, \] \[ B1 > H3 \Rightarrow \text{no ping}, \quad B1 \le H4 \Rightarrow \text{ping}. \] Hence, \(B1\) produces \(2\) pings. For ball \(B2\): Since \(B2\) is smaller than \(H2\), the smallest hoop, it must be smaller than all hoops. Thus, \(B2\) pings on \(H1, H2, H3,\) and \(H4\). Total pings for \(B2 = 4\). For ball \(B3\): Since \(B3\) is larger than \(H1\), the largest hoop, it cannot fit into any hoop. Therefore, \(B3\) produces \(0\) pings. Step 3: Compute the total number of pings. Adding the pings from \(B1, B2,\) and \(B3\), \[ \text{Total pings} = 2 + 4 + 0 = 6. \] Hence, the total number of pings for balls \(B1, B2,\) and \(B3\) is \(6\).
To determine which statement about the relative sizes of the balls is NOT NECESSARILY true, we need to analyze the given conditions and test each option.
The statement B1 < B6 < B3 is NOT NECESSARILY true based on the provided data, as the exact sizes of B1 and B6 relative to each other cannot be determined from the known conditions. Hence, the correct answer is:
B1 < B6 < B3
Step 1: Understanding the Question:
We need to identify which of the given inequalities about the ball sizes cannot be definitively proven from the information given. We will use the size relationships derived in the previous question.
Step 2: Reviewing Ball Size Deductions:
- B3 is the largest ball.
- B2 is the smallest ball.
- B5 > H4 and B1 $\le$ H4 $\implies$ B5 > B1.
- B1 > H3 and B4 $\le$ H3 $\implies$ B1 > B4.
- B5 > H4 and B6 $\le$ H4 $\implies$ B5 > B6.
- The definite order is: B3 > B5 > B1 > B4 > B2.
- The position of B6 is uncertain. We only know B5 > B6 and B6 > H2 > B2. The relationship between B6 and B1, and B6 and B4 is not determined by the given rules.
Step 3: Evaluating the Options:
- (A) B4 < B5 < B3:
- Is B5 < B3? Yes, B3 is the largest.
- Is B4 < B5? Yes, we established B5 > B1 and B1 > B4, so B5 > B4.
- This statement is necessarily true.
- (B) B2 < B1 < B5:
- Is B1 < B5? Yes, we established this.
- Is B2 < B1? Yes, B2 is the smallest.
- This statement is necessarily true.
- (C) B1 < B5 < B3:
- Is B5 < B3? Yes.
- Is B1 < B5? Yes.
- This statement is necessarily true.
- (D) B1 < B6 < B3:
- Is B6 < B3? Yes, B3 is the largest.
- Is B1 < B6? This is unknown. From Rule 1, we have B1 $\le$ H4 and B6 $\le$ H4. This does not allow us to compare B1 and B6. It is possible that B1 < B6, B1 > B6, or B1 = B6.
- Since we cannot prove B1 < B6, the entire statement is not necessarily true.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The relationship between B1 and B6 cannot be determined from the given information. Therefore, the statement "B1 < B6 < B3" is not necessarily true.
To solve the problem, we need to determine the relative sizes of the hoops H1, H2, H3, and H4 based on the given conditions. We have information about which balls made a ping when tested with each hoop, which indicates that the ball passed through the hoop.
Putting these conditions together, we need to order the hoops from smallest to largest:
Therefore, the order of hoops from smallest to largest is:
H2 < H3 < H4 < H1
Thus, the correct answer is:
H2 < H3 < H4 < H1
Step 1: Identify the task. There are 6 balls and 4 hoops, giving a total of \(6 \times 4 = 24\) tests. The objective is to determine the total number of pings across all these tests. Depending on the uncertainty in relative sizes, the answer may be a fixed value or a small range. Step 2: Determine pings for each ball. From the given size orders, \[ B3 > B5 > B1 > B4 > B2, \quad H1 > H4 > H3 > H2, \] and the additional information \[ B5 > B6 > B2. \] Analyzing each ball: - Ball \(B1\): It pings on \(H1\) and \(H4\), but not on \(H2\) or \(H3\). Total pings \(= 2\). - Ball \(B2\): Being the smallest ball, it pings on all four hoops. Total pings \(= 4\). - Ball \(B3\): Being the largest ball, it does not ping on any hoop. Total pings \(= 0\). - Ball \(B4\): It pings on \(H1\), does not ping on \(H2\), pings on \(H3\), and pings on \(H4\). Total pings \(= 3\). - Ball \(B5\): It pings on \(H1\) only, and does not ping on \(H2\), \(H3\), or \(H4\). Total pings \(= 1\). - Ball \(B6\): It pings on \(H1\), does not ping on \(H2\), and pings on \(H4\). Its interaction with \(H3\) cannot be uniquely determined, since its size relative to \(H3\) is unknown. Hence, total pings for \(B6\) are either \(2\) or \(3\). Step 3: Add the total number of pings. Summing the contributions from all balls, \[ \text{Total pings} = 2 + 4 + 0 + 3 + 1 + (2 \text{ or } 3). \] This gives \[ \text{Total pings} = 12 \text{ or } 13. \] Step 4: Conclusion. The total number of pings across all 24 tests can be either \(12\) or \(13\), depending on the relative size of ball \(B6\) compared to hoop \(H3\).
Step 1: Understanding the Question:
We need to find the total number of pings across all 24 tests (6 balls x 4 hoops). The answer might be a specific number or a range if there is uncertainty.
Step 2: Calculating Pings for Each Ball:
We use the established size orders: B3 > B5 > B1 > B4 > B2 and H1 > H4 > H3 > H2. The position of B6 is B5 > B6 > B2.
- B1 Pings: On H1(Y), H4(Y). On H2(N), H3(N). Total = 2.
- B2 Pings: Smallest ball, pings on all hoops. Total = 4.
- B3 Pings: Largest ball, pings on no hoops. Total = 0.
- B4 Pings:
- vs H1 (Y, since H1 is largest)
- vs H2 (N, rule 4)
- vs H3 (Y, rule 2)
- vs H4 (Y, since H4 > H3 $\ge$ B4)
- Total = 3.
- B5 Pings:
- vs H1 (Y, rule 3)
- vs H2 (N, rule 4)
- vs H3 (N, since B5 > B1 > H3)
- vs H4 (N, rule 1)
- Total = 1.
- B6 Pings:
- vs H1 (Y, rule 3)
- vs H2 (N, rule 4)
- vs H4 (Y, rule 1)
- vs H3: This is unknown. We know B1 > H3 and B4 $\le$ H3. We do not have information to place B6 relative to H3. B6 could be larger or smaller than H3.
- So, B6 pings on H3 if B6 $\le$ H3, and does not ping if B6 > H3. - Total = 2 or 3.
Step 3: Calculating the Total Number of Pings:
Summing the pings for all balls:
Total Pings = Pings(B1) + Pings(B2) + Pings(B3) + Pings(B4) + Pings(B5) + Pings(B6)
Total Pings = 2 + 4 + 0 + 3 + 1 + (2 or 3)
Total Pings = 10 + (2 or 3)
- If B6 does not ping on H3, Total = 10 + 2 = 12.
- If B6 pings on H3, Total = 10 + 3 = 13.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The total number of pings can be either 12 or 13, depending on the size of B6 relative to H3. The statement that best captures this is "12 or 13". This corresponds to option (C).
(Note: While "At least 9" is technically true, it is not the BEST description of the total, as we can prove the total must be at least 12. "12 or 13" is the most precise and accurate statement.)
Disregard commonly known facts. Which conclusion would follow on the basis of given statements only?
Statement (I): Some bottles are car. Some cars are cycle.
Conclusion: \[\begin{array}{rl} \bullet & \text{[(I)] Some bottles are cycle is a possibility.} \\ \bullet & \text{[(II)] All bottles are cycle.} \\ \end{array}\]
For any natural number $k$, let $a_k = 3^k$. The smallest natural number $m$ for which \[ (a_1)^1 \times (a_2)^2 \times \dots \times (a_{20})^{20} \;<\; a_{21} \times a_{22} \times \dots \times a_{20+m} \] is: