Step 1: Test for linearity.
A system is linear if it satisfies:
1. Additivity: $x_1 + x_2 \rightarrow y_1 + y_2$
2. Homogeneity: $kx(t) \rightarrow ky(t)$
Let’s apply scaling: \[ x(t) \rightarrow kx(t) \Rightarrow y(t) = t \cdot kx(t) + 4 \Rightarrow ky(t) = kt \cdot x(t) + 4k \neq y(t) \] So the "+4" term makes it non-linear.
Step 2: Test for time invariance.
Shift input: $x(t - t_0) \Rightarrow y(t) = t \cdot x(t - t_0) + 4$
Compare with shifted output:
$y(t - t_0) = (t - t_0) \cdot x(t - t_0) + 4$
They are not equal. Hence, it is time-varying.
Step 3: Stability.
If input is bounded, e.g., $x(t) = \sin(t)$, still $y(t) = t \sin(t) + 4$, which grows unbounded as $t \rightarrow \infty$. Hence, unstable.
Conclusion: $\boxed{\text{Non-linear, time-varying and unstable}}$
Consider the unity-negative-feedback system shown in Figure (i) below, where gain \( K \geq 0 \). The root locus of this system is shown in Figure (ii) below.
For what value(s) of \( K \) will the system in Figure (i) have a pole at \( -1 + j1 \)?

Consider a message signal \( m(t) \) which is bandlimited to \( [-W, W] \), where \( W \) is in Hz. Consider the following two modulation schemes for the message signal:
• Double sideband-suppressed carrier (DSB-SC): \[ f_{DSB}(t) = A_c m(t) \cos(2\pi f_c t) \] • Amplitude modulation (AM): \[ f_{AM}(t) = A_c \left( 1 + \mu m(t) \right) \cos(2\pi f_c t) \] Here, \( A_c \) and \( f_c \) are the amplitude and frequency (in Hz) of the carrier, respectively. In the case of AM, \( \mu \) denotes the modulation index. Consider the following statements:
(i) An envelope detector can be used for demodulation in the DSB-SC scheme if \( m(t)>0 \) for all \( t \).
(ii) An envelope detector can be used for demodulation in the AM scheme only if \( m(t)>0 \) for all \( t \).
Which of the following options is/are correct?